rect
American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State
Patriot News Network.jpg
Patriot Party Political.jpg
American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
ARMED LIBERTY MOVEMENT.jpg
AmericanPatriotColumn.jpg
American Patriot MILITIA.jpg
American Patriot Party, State Elections Division Candidates Oregon State
American Patriot Wiki 1.jpg
American Patriot Party 7.jpg
American Party Peoples.jpg
Wikipedia Patriot Patriot.jpg
Voting Third Party.jpg
Secretary of State Of.jpg
American Elections Wiki.jpg
Patriot Party Parties.jpg
American Elections Cr.jpg
AmericanPatriotElection.jpg
American Elections Ct.jpg
AmericansPatriotElections.jpg
Division of Power.jpg
Fundamental Laws of Freedom.jpg
Republics and Represention.jpg
Privileges and Contracts.jpg
True American Patriotism.jpg
Freedom Opinion Consent.jpg
Socialism Defined Am erican.jpg
Slavery American Patriots.jpg
Voluntary Slavery.jpg
Existence of Slavery.jpg
Distant Legislatures.jpg
Patriots PoliticalLeftRight.jpg
Wards of the State.jpg
Enterprises of Ambition.jpg
Pretense of Authority.jpg
ThePatriotsContract.jpg
States Liberty Bill.jpg
APP A TAX - Anonymity Tax.jpg
County Secession Constelati.jpg
Two Candidate Vote Option.jpg
ThePatriotsRecruiting.jpg
Magna Carta 1215.jpg
English Bill of Rights 1689.jpg
John Locke Tolleration 1689.jpg
John Locke Treatise Civil.jpg
Rights of the Colonists1772.jpg
Witherspoon Confederation.jpg
VA Declaration of Rights.jpg
Witherspoon Providence 1776.jpg
Declaration of Independence.jpg
Articles of Confederation.jpg
MS Declaration of Rights.jpg
Founders Letters of Intent.jpg
Ratifying Conventions 1788.jpg
VirginiaRatifying Conventionjpg
US Constitutional Compaign.jpg
Bill of Rights & Amendments.jpg
VirginiaKentuckyResolution.jpg
PatriotsRecruitsScout.jpg
American Patriot Party 9.jpg
PatriotsRecruitsScouts.jpg
APP Opposition Issues Party.jpg
AmericanPatriotsElection.jpg
APP Special Reports.jpg
APP Commentary & Insight.jpg
APP Internet Posts Articles.jpg
APP Cartoons & Illustration.jpg
American Patriot Party 6.jpg
American Patriot Party 3.jpg
APP YouTube Video Choices.jpg
AmericanPatriotElections.jpg
State Party Organization.jpg
American Patriots Election.jpg
American Patriot Party 5.jpg
What Makes Us Different.jpg
American Elections Wi.jpg
PatriotsRecruiters.jpg
APP Products & Merchandise.jpg
ThePatriot.jpg
American Patriot Party Logo.jpg
APP Graphics Logo & License.jpg
American Patriot Party 8.jpg
ThePatriotReview.jpg
Constitution.org.jpg
University of Chicago Const.jpg
ThePatriotStarring.jpg
Cornell University Federal.jpg
Federal Law Reference.jpg
Federal Law Research.jpg
Federal Regulations Code.jpg
ThePatriotDraftPick.jpg
American Patriot Party 4.jpg
Armory Arms Firearms Sales .jpg
American Offense Defense.jpg
APP Communication Directive.jpg
APP Defense Preparedness.jpg
Logistics.jpg
Sampson & Redoubt Defense.jpg
Self Sufficiency.jpg
APP Volunteer Patriots.jpg
International Independence.jpg

ThePatriotsDraftPicks.jpg 

 

 

 

ThePatriotVideoPick.jpg 




AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF THE INDEPENDENT AND UNITED STATES:

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ALABAMA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ALASKA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF AMERICAN SAMOA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ARIZONA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ARKANSAS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF CALIFORNIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF COLORADO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF CONNECTICUT

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF DELAWARE

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF FLORIDA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF GEORGIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF GUAM

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF HAWAII

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF IDAHO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF ILLINOIS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF INDIANA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF IOWA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF KANSAS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF KENTUCKY

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF LOUISIANA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MAINE

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MARSHALL ISLANDS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MARYLAND

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MASSACHUSETTS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MICHIGAN

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MINNESOTA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MISSISSIPPI

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MISSOURI

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF MONTANA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEBRASKA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEVADA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEW JERSEY

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEW MEXICO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NEW YORK

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NORTH CAROLINA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NORTH DAKOTA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF OHIO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF OKLAHOMA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF OREGON

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF PALAU

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF PUERTO RICO

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF RHODE ISLAND

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF SOUTH CAROLINA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF SOUTH DAKOTA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF TENNESSEE

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF TEXAS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF UTAH

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF VERMONT

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF VIRGIN ISLANDS

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF VIRGINIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF WASHINGTON

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF WEST VIRGINIA

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF WISCONSIN

AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY OF WYOMING

 

ThePatriotsDraftChoice.jpg 


Oregon Patriot Party.COM
American Patriot Party.US

 

PatriotRevolution.jpg 



APP National
Richard Taylor

 

PatriotsFacebook.jpg 

 

APP National

 

PatriotsTwitter.jpg 



APPNational
AMPatriotParty
RichardTaylorAPP
 

PatriotsYouTube.jpg 

 

APP YouTube



PatriotAmericanRevoltion.jpg







AmericanPatriotNewsFeed.jpg



Ustream



AmericanRevolution.jpg



APP Archives Wayback Machine
Campaign for Liberty




DeclarationIndependence.jpg


APP Daily Paul
APP Campaign for Liberty
APP Freedom Works
APP Topix


Other Liberty Active Links


John Birch Society org
Ben Swann - Reality Report
Daily Paul
Infowars
C4L Facebook
C4L Twitter
C4L Feeds
Freedomworks

International Liberty Active Links

UKIP -
United Kingdom Independence Party

Daniel Hannon - MEP

Daniel Hannon - Twitter:

Nigel Farage - MEP

Nigel Farage - Web Site

Nigel Farage - Twitter:   

  Indirect Links


WIKIPEDIA - Patriot_Party

WIKIPEDIA - Political_Parties Oregon

WIKIPEDIA - List_of_ Political_Parties_in_the_Unit ed_St ates

WIKIPEDIA - Patriot_ Party

WIKIPEDIA Patriot

WIKIPEDIA - Political _colour

WIKIPEDIA -  Constitution_Party

WIKIPEDIA -  Conservative_political_partie s

WIKIPEDIA - Conservative_Political_Partie s

WIKIPEDIA Politics_ of_the_United_States

WIKIPEDIA - American_Patriot_Party

Google 1
Sons of Liberty:
SOL #1
SOL #2
 
  APP Opposition Groups:

  Southern Poverty Law Center - The Center for Propaganda for Socialism in America which opposes CITIZEN MILITIAS

  This is in Opposition of the Constitution as it was written and against the principles of Common Law... A REVERSE HATE GROUP:

LINKS:

SPL #1
SPL #2 patriot-movememnt
SPL #3 entelligence-files
SPL #4
     This group say they want to protect  on one hand - but then allow the deviant of society to brain wash and then misuse others or each other outside the Laws of Nature; Allowing for the existence of Voluntary Slavery  and Slavery - Through the relinquishment of inalienable rights.

This Group, Communist / Socialist in nature,  places a form of "Subjugated Peace" under a central national government;  Instead of abiding by the True Principles of Freedom established in small well represented and independent republics;

 See John Locke with regard to such a "peace"  word search LAMB on his Second Treatise on Civil Government.

They are a proponent of reverse hate; and are a proponent for the use of National Federal force, cumulated by government "laws" which have been created without authority  - i.e. under the
PRETENSE OF AUTHORITY.

See Virginia Resolution 1798, James Madison, denouncing when the government makes itself, and not the Constitution the Measure of its powers.

 
  APP NETWORKED LINKS
  
YouTube
Google Search
Yahoo Search
Bing Search
Netscape Search
Klare Taylor Publishers
Pacific Westcom
Green Springs
Landship
ProToonerz
The Comics Section

 
 
NASA
WEATHER.GOV
NOAA RADAR 1
RADAR NW
RADAR 3
 
 

American Patriot Party

Inalienable Rights, States Rights, Local Control.

Great Resources for Founders Documents


Constitution.Org
http://www.constitution.org

University of Chicago, Founders Constitution
http://press-pubs.uchicago.e du/founders/



States State Elections Division, Secretary of State Directory and State Constitutions:


ALABAMA

Office of Secretary of State
PO Box 5616
Montgomery, AL 36106
(334) 242-7559 FAX (334) 242-2444
http://www.sos.state.al.us/ele ction/index.cfm

Alabama Elections and Voting
http://www.alabama.gov/port al/government/voting.jsp

Alabama Elections Division
http://www.alabamainteractiv e.org/  http://www.sos.state.al.us/ele ction/index.cfm

Alabama State Constitution
http://www.legislature.state.al .us/CodeOfAlabama/Constitu tion/

ALASKA

Alaska Elections Division and Voting:
http://www.state.ak.us/local/a kdir1.shtml

 PO Box 110017
Juneau, AK 99811-0017
(907) 465-4611 FAX (907) 465-3203

Alaska State Government Directory
http://www.state.ak.us

Alaska State Constitution
http://ltgov.state.ak.us/constit ution.php


AMERICAN SAMOA

Election Officer
PO Box 3790
Pago Pago AS 96799
011-684-633-2522 FAX 011-684-633-7116
http://www.electionoffice.as
 

ARIZONA

Secretary of State's Office
1700 W. Washington, 7th Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85007
(602) 542-8683 FAX (602) 542-6172
http://www.azsos.gov

Arizona Elections Division and Voting
http://www.azsos.gov/election

Arizona State Constitution
http://www.azleg.gov/Constitu tion.asp


ARKANSAS

Arkansas Secretary of State
http://www.sos.arkansas.gov

Secretary of State, State Capitol, Room 026
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 682-3419 FAX (501) 682-3408

Arkansas Constitution
http://www.sos.arkansas.gov/ ar-constitution/arconst/arcon st.htm


CALIFORNIA

California Secretary of State
http://www.sos.arkansas.gov/ ar-constitution/arconst/arcon st.htm

California State Elections Division and Voting
http://www.ss.ca.gov/election s/elections.htm

 1500 11th St., 5th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 657-2166 FAX (916) 653-3214

California State Constitution
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/con st-toc.html


COLORADO

Colorado Secretary of State
http://www.sos.state.co.us

Colorado State Elections Division and Voting
http://www.elections.colorado .gov

1700 Broadway, Suite 270
Denver, CO 80290
(303) 894-2680 FAX (303) 869-7731

Colorado State Constitution
http://www.colorado.gov/dpa/ doit/archives/constitution/ind ex.html


CONNECTICUT

Connecticut Secretary of State
http://www.sots.ct.gov

Connecticut State Elections Division and Voting
http://www.sots.ct.gov/Electio nsServices/ElectionIndex.ht ml

30 Trinity Street
Hartford, CT 06106
(860) 509-6100 FAX (860) 509-6127

Connecticut State Constitution
http://www.sots.ct.gov/Regist erManual/SectionI/ctconstit.ht m


DELAWARE

Delaware Secretary of State
http://www.state.de.us/sos

Delaware State Elections Division
http://www.state.de.us/electio n

 111 S. West Street, Suite 10
Dover, DE 19904
(302) 739-4277 FAX (302) 739- 6794

Delaware Elections Directory
http://delaware.gov/egov/port al.nsf

Delaware State Constitution
http://www.state.de.us/facts/c onstit/de_const.htm


DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA - WASHINGTON DC

District of Columbia Secretary of State
http://www.os.dc.gov/os/site

District of Columbia Board of Ethics and Elections
http://www.dcboee.org

441 Fourth St., NW, Suite 250N
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 727-2525 FAX (202) 347-2648

District of Columbia Home Rule Act
http://www.abfa.com/ogc/hrac t.htm


FLORIDA

Florida Department of State
http://www.dos.state.fl.us

Florida State Elections Division
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/i ndex.html

Room 316, R.A. Gray Building
500 S. Bronough Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250
(850) 245-6200 FAX (850) 245-6217

Florida State Constitution
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Stat utes/index.cfm


GEORGIA

Georgia Secretary of State
http://www.georgia.gov

Georgia State Elections Division
 Suite 1104, West Tower
2 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, SE
Atlanta, GA 30334-1505
(404) 656-2871 FAX (404) 651-9536
http://www.sos.state.ga.us/el ections

Georgia State Constitution
http://www.sos.state.ga.us/E LECTIONS/constitution.htm


GUAM

Guam Secretary of State
Governor of Guam
http://guamgovernor.net

Guam Election Commission
PO Box BG
Agana, GU 96910
(671) 477-9791 Fax: (671) 477-1895
http://www.guamelection.org

Attorney General of Guam
The Organic Act of Guam
http://www.guamattorneygen eral.com


HAWAII

Office of Elections
802 Lehua Avenue
Pearl City, HI 96782
(808) 453-8683 FAX (808) 453-6006
http://www.state.hi.us/electio ns


IDAHO

Idaho Secretary of State
700 W. Jefferson, Rm. 203
Boise, ID 83720-0080
(208) 334-2300 FAX (208) 334-2282
http://www.idsos.state.id.us/e lect/eleindex.htm


ILLINOIS

State Board of Elections
1020 S. Spring St., PO Box 4187
Springfield, IL 62708
(217) 782-4141 FAX (217) 782-5959
http://www.elections.il.gov


INDIANA

Indiana Election Division
302 W. Washington, Rm E204
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 232-3939 FAX (317) 233-6793
http://www.in.gov/sos/electio ns


IOWA

Iowa Secretary of State Office
321 E. 12th Street
Des Moines, IA 50319
(515) 281-5823 FAX (515) 281-7142
http://www.sos.state.ia.us


KANSAS

Deputy Assistant for Elections
120 SW 10th Ave.
First Floor, Memorial Hall
Topeka, Kansas 66612-1594
(785) 296-4561 FAX (785) 291-3051
http://www.kssos.org


KENTUCKY

State Board of Elections
140 Walnut St.,
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 573-7100 FAX (502) 573-4369
http://www.kysos.com/index/ main/elecdiv.asp


LOUISIANA

Commissioner of Elections
8549 United Plaza Blvd.
P.O. Box 94125
Baton Rouge, LA 70802-9125
(225) 922-0900 FAX (225) 922-0945
http://www.sec.state.la.us/ele ctions/elections-index.htm


MAINE

Secretary of State
101 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333-0101
(207) 624-7734 FAX (207) 287-5428

Elections Director
101 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333-0101
(207) 624-7734 FAX (207) 287-5428
http://www.maine.gov/sos/ce c/elec


MARYLAND

State Board of Elections
P.O. Box 6486
Annapolis, Maryland 21401-0486
(410) 269-2840 FAX (410) 974-2019
http://www.elections.state.md .us


MASSACHUSETTS

Election Division
One Ashburton Place, Room 1705
Boston, MA 02108
(617) 727-2828 FAX (617) 742-3238
http://www.state.ma.us/sec/el e/eleidx.htm


MICHIGAN

Bureau of Elections
Treasury Building, 1st Floor
430 W. Allegan Street
Lansing, MI 48918
(517) 373-2540 FAX (517) 241-2784
 
http://www.michigan.gov/sos/ 0,1606,7-127-1633---,00.htm l


MINNESOTA

Secretary of State
180 State Office Building
100 Rev. Martin Luther King Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
(651) 215-1440 FAX (651) 296-9073
http://www.sos.state.mn.us/e lection/index.html

MISSISSIPPI

Secretary of State for Elections
PO Box 136, 401 Mississippi St.
Jackson, MS 39205
(601) 359-6368 FAX (601) 359-1499
http://www.sos.state.ms.us


MISSOURI

Missouri Secretary of State's Office
PO Box 1767
Jefferson City, MO 65102
(573) 751-2301 FAX (573) 526-3242
http://www.sos.mo.gov/electi ons


MONTANA

Deputy for Elections
PO Box 202801
Helena, MT 59620
(406) 444-5376 FAX (406) 444-2023
http://sos.state.mt.us/css/ind ex.asp


NEBRASKA

Secretary of State
State Capitol, Suite 2300
Lincoln, NE 68502
(402) 471-3229 FAX (402) 471-3237
http://www.nol.org/home/SOS /Elections/election.htm


NEVADA

Nevada Secretary of State
101 North Carson St., Suite 3
Carson City, NV 89701
(775) 684-5793 FAX (775) 684-5718
http://sos.state.nv.us


NEW HAMPSHIRE

Secretary of State
State House, Room 204
Concord, NH 03301-4989
(603) 271-5335 FAX (603) 271-7933
http://www.sos.nh.gov/electio nsnew.htm


NEW JERSEY

Division of Elections
Office of the Attorney General
44 South Clinton Avenue, 7th Floor
P.O Box 304
Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0304
(609) 292-3760 FAX (609)777-1280
http://www.njelections.org


NEW MEXICO

Director of Elections
State Capitol Annex
325 Don Gaspar, Suite 300
Santa Fe, NM 87503
(505) 827-3620 FAX (505) 827-8403
http://www.sos.state.nm.us/M ain/Elections/ElectionInfo.ht m


NEW YORK

State Board of Elections
40 Steuben Street
Albany, NY 12207
(518) 474-8100 (518) 486-4068
http://www.elections.state.ny. us


NORTH CAROLINA

State Board of Elections
PO Box 27255
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7255
(919) 733-7173 FAX (919) 715-0135
http://www.sboe.state.nc.us


NORTH DAKOTA

North Dakota Secretary of State
600 E Boulevard Ave Dept 108
Bismarck, ND 58505-0500
(701) 328-3660 FAX (701) 328-2992
http://www.nd.gov/sos


OHIO

Ohio Secretary of State
Director of Elections
180 E. Broad St., 15th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
(614) 466-2585 FAX (614) 752-4360
http://www.sos.state.oh.us/s os/elections/index.html


OKLAHOMA

State Election Board
Room 6, State Capitol
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
(405) 521-2391 FAX (405) 521-6457
http://www.state.ok.us/~electi ons


OREGON

Director of Elections
Office of the Secretary of State
141 State Capitol
Salem, OR 97310
(503) 986-1518 FAX (503) 373-7414
http://www.sos.state.or.us/el ections/elechp.htm


PENNSYLVANIA

Commissioner of Elections
210 North Office Building
Harrisburg, PA 17120
(717) 787-5280 FAX (717) 705-0721
http://www.dos.state.pa.us/bc el/site/default.asp


PUERTO RICO

Puerto Rico State Election Commission
P.O. Box 195552
San Juan, PR 00919-5552
(787) 777-8675 FAX (787) 296-0173
http://www.ceepur.org


RHODE ISLAND

State Board of Elections
50 Branch Avenue
Providence, RI 02904
(401) 222-2345 FAX (401) 222-3135
http://www.elections.state.ri.u s


SOUTH CAROLINA

State Election Commission
Post Office Box 5987
Columbia, SC 29250
(803) 734-9060 FAX (803) 734-9366
http://www.state.sc.us/scsec


SOUTH DAKOTA

Election Supervisor
500 East Capitol Avenue
Pierre, SD 57501
(605) 773-3537 FAX (605) 773-6580
http://www.state.sd.us/sos


TENNESSEE

Tennessee Secretary of State's Office
312 Eighth Avenue North
9th Floor
Nashville, TN 37243
(615) 741-7956 FAX (615) 741-1278
http://www.state.tn.us/sos/ele ction.htm


TEXAS

Director of Elections, General Law Division
Secretary of State/ Election Division
Post Office Box 12060
Austin, TX 78711-2060
(512) 463-5650 FAX (512) 475-2811
http://www.sos.state.tx.us/ele ctions/index.shtml


UTAH

Utah State Elections Office
Utah State Capitol Complex
East Office Building, Suite E325
P.O. Box 142325
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-2325
(801) 538-1041 FAX (801) 538-1133
http://www.elections.utah.gov


VERMONT

Director of Elections and Campaign Finance
Office of Secretary of State
26 Terrace Street, Drawer 09
Montpelier, Vermont 05609-1101
(802) 828-2304 FAX (802) 828-5171
http://www.sec.state.vt.us/#el ections


VIRGIN ISLANDS

Supervisor of Elections
Election System of the Virgin Islands
Post Office Box 1499, Kingshill
St. Croix, VI 00851-1499
(340) 773-1021 FAX (340) 773-4523
http://www.vivote.gov


VIRGINIA

Secretary of State, Board of Elections
200 North 9th Street, Room 101
Richmond, VA 23219
(800) 552-9745 or (804) 864-8901 FAX (804) 371-0194
http://www.sbe.state.va.us


WASHINGTON

Office of Secretary of State, Elections Division
Legislative Building, P.O. Box 40220
Olympia, WA 98504-0220
(360) 902-4180 FAX (360) 586-5629
http://www.vote.wa.gov


WEST VIRGINIA

Manager of Elections
West Virginia Secretary of State Elections Division
1900 Kanawha Blvd E.
State Capitol Room 157-K
Charleston, WV 25305-0770
(304) 558-6000 FAX (304) 558-0900
http://www.wvsos.com


WISCONSIN

Wisconsin State Elections Board
17 West Main Street, Suite 310
Madison, WI 53703-3305
P.O. Box 2973
Madison, WI 53701-2973
(608) 266-8087 FAX (608) 267-0500
http://elections.state.wi.us


WYOMING

Wyoming Secretary of State's Office
200 W. 24th Street
Cheyenne, WY 82002-0020
(307) 777-3573 FAX (307) 777-7640
http://soswy.state.wy.us/electi on/election.htm


Federal Government Links:

Official US Department of State
http://www.state.gov/

University of Chicago, Founders Constitution
http://press-pubs.uchicago.e du/founders/

Constitution.Org
http://www.constitution.org


Ron Paul
http://www.pacificwestcom.co m/ronpaul





American Patriot.

Home of the American Patriots of the American Patriot Party.
 

 

American Patriot Party
with regard to
Distant Legislatures

 

 

Distance was, is, and will always be, an important factor with regard to freedom.

The issue of distant legislatures "3000 milesdistant" at that time resembles that of the distance between Washington and California, not only in distance, but in the amount of real concern anyone 50, 100, 1000 or 3000 miles distant can ever possibly have in any community which issues involve that within 1, 5 or 10 miles of their location.

And as in 1772 was done against the Colonists, the federal government to tax and regulate us, must, as was done by the British government, in effect must also
"bribe" against our interests;

Instead of local county governments championing the interests of the local citizens they are suppose to represent, they find themselves clamoring for federal or state dollars that should have never left the county, so that they may regain the money through
"bribes" of compliance of programs from the federal government and state capitol governments; State governments which are also distant to local concerns, and who also allow themselves to be bribed by national and international interests.


------------------------------------

Rights of the Colonists 1772

Samuel Adams:
"...Now what liberty can there be, where propertyis taken away without ""consent"? Can it be said with any colour of truth and Justice, that this Continent ofthree thousand miles in length, and a breadth as yet unexplored, in which however, its supposed, there are five millions of people, has the least voice, vote or influence in the decisions of the British Parliament?

Have they, all together, any more right or power to return a single member to that house of commons, who have not inadvertently, but deliberately assumed a power to dispose of their lives,
8 Liberties and properties, than to choose an Emperor of China!

Had the Colonists a right to return members to the British parliament, it would only be hurtful; as from their local situation and circumstances it is
"impossible" they should be evertruly and properly represented there.

The inhabitants of this country in all probability in a few years will be more numerous, than those of Great Britain and Ireland together; yet it is
absurdly expected[Volume 5, Page 397] by the promoters of the present measures, that these, with their posterity to all generations, should be easy while their property, shall be disposed of by a house of commons at three thousand miles "distant" from them;

and whocannot be supposed to have the least care or concern for their real interest:Who have not only no natural care for their interest,

"but must be in effect>>> "bribed"against it"; as every "burden" they lay on the colonists is so much saved or gained to themselves. ..."


How clearly we now find ourselves in the same position as those founders.

The federal government forcing taxation, skimming what it wishes to support its bloated dependent bureaucracy, then offering some of it back to the states in government programs or highway funds if the state complies with its policies and national mandates;

Clearly using "
Bribery" of the taxpayers own money already collected from them to force upon them compliance to those federal mandates.

Far better, would be for the states to take control of the highways and never let the money out of the state.

The interests of a community is only able to be properly represented by those who actually have an actual physical interest in the local community.

A condition that should stop all national and state impositions at the county border to be legislated by each local community as to its merit with regard to their community and in regard to retained rights and constitutional merit.

Counties
that have land masses near or greater than the smallest states that established the Constitution; for which, should have no less concern as a state to their representation and powers of legislation in those lands they encompass;

Counties
should have no less the power and control by the people through their own local county legislatures with regard to their local communities property and issues within those territories.

This is the local  "Vicintity" described by the founders to adiquately establish true representation to a commonwealths interests and needs.

This is opposed to a local county or community's present conditions which is often adversely and arbitrarily dictated in areas of  property, building, zoning, environment and others by distant state and federal mandates not dictated by the best interests or choices of the local citizens.

That such control should be encompassed  by those most effected no greater area of 5 miles, or 1 mile,  which ever is least within any county, decided in county courts;

Thereby the term of "public opinion" being correctly defined as "those most effected" and "actually effected" by any issue within that area, setting preference and precedence of opinion to those actually living within this area.

The present condition is that where businesses, buildings, towns and cities could be created by local residences, the determination is by legislative assemblies that are distant from that local area, limiting such development by arbitrary administrative decision or legislated "required population", of which bar is constantly being lifted beyond the capability of the local community to dictate; All to be decided by distant legislatures whose concerns are not of the community, but control of those communities by those distant legislatures.

This we intend to change.




Constitutional Debates MONDAY, June 16, 1788.[1] [Elliot misprinted this as Monday, June 14, 1788.]



Patrick Henry:
"What says our bill of rights? "that excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." Are you not, therefore, now calling on those gentlemen who are to compose Congress, to prescribe trials and define punishments without this control? Will they find sentiments there similar to this bill of rights?
You let them loose; you do more you depart from the genius of your country.

That paper tells you that the trial of crimes shall be by jury, and held in the state where the crime shall have been committed. Under this extensive provision, they may proceed in a manner extremely dangerous to liberty: a person accused may be carried fromone extremity of the statute to another, and be tried, not by an impartial jury of the "vicinage", acquaintedwith his character and the circumstances of the fact, but by a juryunacquainted with both, and who may be biased against him.

Is not this sufficient to alarm men?

How different is this from the immemorial practice of your British ancestors, and your own!

I need not tell you that, by the common law, a number of hundreds were required on a jury, and that afterwards it was sufficient if the jurors came from the
same county. With "less" than this the people of England have never been satisfied. That paper (the Constitution) "ought" to have declared the"common lawin force."




Here we have Patrick Henry describing the inconsistencies of the Constitution and the danger that could very well arise from it.

Dangers which have and are arising every day as administrative law, federal and state policies attack the liberties through arbitrary interoffice policies and decisions from distant legislatures, state and federal, and proclaimed as "law".

This problem compounded through lobbying from international special interest groups, international corporations and national unions;

All which are
social "collectives" that through such lobbying attempt and succeed in dictating local policy and local interests.

This misuse of limited constitutional powers is a evident corruption of a clear intent by the Founders that describe the Constitution as having no additional new powers but only those to give effect to those defined delegated powers.

The 16th amendment was and is unconstitutional as it is not founded by any intent of the original compact.




Rights of the Colonists 1772 regarding rights possessed of "original compacts"

Samuel Adams: "When Men enter into Society, it is by voluntary consent; and they have a right to demandandinsist uponthe performance of such conditions, Andprevious limitations as form an equitable "original compact".--

Every natural Right not expressly given up or from the nature of a Social Compact"necessarily" ceded "remains".--".--"




See also the 17th Grievance of the Declaration of Independence where it defines one of the definitions of a tyrannical government, and reason for our separation of that government:




Grievance 17: "For imposing taxes on us without our consent";




Quite apparently, this was not a right to be "necessarily ceded".




Constitution: Article VI: All Debts contracted "and "Engagements" entered into (Oaths and Declarations), before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United Sates under this Constitution as under the "Confederation". This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be "made" in >>>"pursuance thereof" ; and all Treaties (Oaths and Declarations) "made", or which shall be "made", under the ("limited")Authority of the United States, shall be supreme Law of the Land ...."




We have placed the word "limited" so that people will understand that the Constitution and the federal government is not a unlimited power but a very limited and delegated power.

If the states wished, they could remove the federal government in an instant.

... No?

Lets see the "intent" of the Framers of the constitution:




Virginia Ratifying Convention of the Constitution, MONDAY, June 16, 1788:

James Madison (in response to Patrick Henry's statement of caution):
 

"...An observation fell from a gentleman, on the same side with myself, which deserves to be attended to.

>>> If we be dissatisfied with the national government, if we "should choose to renounce {415} it", "this is an additional safeguard to our defence"."




This of course, should be balanced with the Declaration of Independence:




"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object,
evinces a designto reduce them under absolute despotism, it is theirright, it istheir duty, tothrowoff such government and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient suffering of these colonies, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government




But in no way does it remove the right or the duty.


Our government is not broken, it is simply being misused.



------------------



Regarding the Bill of Rights:




Virginia Ratifying Convention of the Constitution, MONDAY, June 16, 1788:


Patrick Henry:
"...And can any man think it troublesome, when we can, by a small interference, prevent our rights from being lost? If you will, like the Virginian government, give them knowledge of the extent of the rights retained by the people, and the powers of themselves, they will, if they be honest men, thank you for it. Will they not wish to go on sure grounds?
But if you leave them otherwise, they will not know how to proceed; and,being in a state of uncertainty, they (government) will "assume" rather than give up powers by IMPLICATION."


(APP Note: A issue exemplified of the federal government of today attempting to make a limited document into a living changing document causing much uncertainty and allowing for the government to assume powers it does not and can never have.)


Patrick Henry: "A bill of rightsmay be summed up in a few words. What do they tell us? That our rights are reserved. Why not say so?Is it because it will consume too much paper?Gentlemen's reasoning against a "bill of rights" does not satisfy me. Without saying which has the right side, it remains doubtful. A bill of rights is a favorite thing with the Virginians and the people of the other states likewise. It may be their prejudice, but the government ought to suit their geniuses; otherwise, its operation will be unhappy. A bill of rights, even if its necessity be doubtful, will "exclude the possibility" of dispute;and, with great submission,I think the best way is to >>>"have NO dispute".

In the present (1776-Confederacy) Constitution, they are restrained from issuing general warrants to search suspected places, or seize persons not named, without evidence of the commission of a fact,  There was certainly some celestial influence governing those who deliberated on that Constitution; for they have, with the most cautious and enlightened circumspection, guarded those indefeasible rights which ought ever to be held sacred! The officers of Congress may come upon you now (with the new Constitution being proposed),fortified with all the terrors of "paramount federal authority". Excisemen may come in multitudes; for the limitation of their numbers no man knows. They may,unless the general government be restrained by a bill of rights, or some similar restriction, go into your cellars and rooms, and search, ransack, and {449} measure, every thing you eat, drink, and wear>>>They (the federal government) "ought" to be"restrained" " Within proper bounds". "




Regarding Limited Powers of the Constitution and federal government:




Virginia Ratifying Convention of the Constitution, MONDAY, June 16, 1788:

Mr. Pendelton:
"... With respect to the necessity of the ten miles square being superseded by the subsequent clause,
which gives them power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any "department" or "officer" thereof,I understand that clause asnotgoing a "single step" beyond the delegated powers. What can it act upon?Some power given by this Constitution.If they should be about to pass a lawin consequence of this clause, they must pursue some of the delegated powers, but can by "no means" depart from them, or arrogate >>>"any new" "powers" ; for the plain language of the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give"effect" to the "delegated" powers."




George Mason: "I will suppose a case. Gentlemen may call it an impossible case, and "suppose" that Congress will act with wisdom and integrity. Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence;and by that clauses (so often called the "sweeping clause")they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws.Now, "suppose" oppressions {442} should arise under "this" government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abusesof "those" powers; could not Congress, under the "idea" of providing for the general welfare, and under their "own" construction, say that this was destroying the "general peace",encouraging sedition, and "poisoning the minds of the people?" And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury? Would they not extend their implication?It appears to me that they may and "will".

And shall the support of our rights depend on the bounty of men "whose interest it may be to oppress us"? That Congress should have power to provide for the general welfare of the Union, I grant. But I wish a clause in the Constitution, with respect to" all powers" which are "not granted", that they are "retained by the states". Otherwise,the power of providing for the general welfare may be"perverted to its destruction".




Mr. Nicholas: .."The clausewhich was affectedly called" the sweeping clause"contained >>> "no new grant of power". To illustrate this position, he observed that, if it had been added at the end of every one of the enumerated powers, instead of being inserted at the end of all,it would be obvious to any one that it was "no" augmentation of power. If, for instance, at the end of the clause granting power to lay and collect taxes, it had been added that they should have power to make necessary and proper laws to lay and collect taxes, who could suspect it to be an addition of power? As it would grant no new power if inserted at the end of each clause, it could not when subjoined to the whole."




The purpose of placing these debates is to illustrate the intent of the Founders and the limited powers of the Constitution.

That the States, and more so the local communities possess powers over the federal government for which there is no, or doubtful, delegated powers.




Patrick Henry:"...for the power of a people in a "free" government is "supposed to be" "paramount" to the "existing power".

See Also: Thomas Jefferson and James Madison's Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, (at right on our Candidates page); Establishing clearly the subordination of the federal government to the states, and the federal government's very limited delegated powers.


That essential natural rights are not removable and cannot be delegated by any legislature:




Samuel Adams, Rights of the Colonists, 1772

"If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should "in terms" renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty,
it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave."  ...

"... The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man; but only to have the law of nature for his rule."--...

All Persons born in the British American Colonies are by the laws of God and nature, and by the Common law of England, exclusive of all charters from the Crown, well Entitled, and by the Acts of the British Parliament are declared to be entitled to all the natural essential, inherent & inseparable Rights Liberties and Privileges of Subjects born in Great Britain, or within the Realm. Among those Rights are the following; which "no" men or "body of men", consistently with their own rights as men and citizens or members of society, can for themselves give up, or take away from others

First
, "The first fundamental positive law of all Commonwealths or States, is the establishing the legislative power; as the first fundamental natural law also, which is to govern even the legislative power itself, is the preservation of the Society."
6

Secondly, The Legislative has "no right" to absolute arbitrary power over the lives and fortunes of the people: Nor can mortals assume a prerogative, not only too high for men, but for Angels; and therefore reserved for the exercise of the Deity alone.--

"The Legislative
cannotJustly assume to itself a power to rule by extempore "arbitrary decrees"; but it is bound to see that Justice is dispensed, and that the rights of the subjects be decided, by promulgated, standing and known laws, and authorized independent Judges;" that is independent as far as possible of Prince or People. "There shall be one rule of Justice for rich and poor; for the favorite in Court, and the Countryman at the Plough."7

Thirdly, The supreme power cannot Justly take from any man, any part of his property without his consent, in person or by his Representative.--

These are some of the >>> first principles ofnatural law & Justice, and the>>>"great Barriers"  of "all free states", ....."




These above rights are reserved rights. As the Constitution has not removed them, and they cannot be removed as the Constitution is prohibited.

From taxation to condemnation of private property, distant legislatures federal and state, have been overstepping their limited authority and powers to control local communities; Being pushed on by national and international lobbyists, special interests, corporations; including cities - which are corporations, and other collectives for arbitrary and pretended reasons of need, environment, aesthetics and convenience for control and profit.





Constitutional Debates MONDAY, June 16, 1788.[1] [Elliot misprinted this as Monday, June 14, 1788.]


Patrick Henry: "... That paper
(the Constitution)
"ought" to have declared the "common lawn" "in force."..."





Mr. GEORGE NICHOLAS, in answer to the two gentlemen {450} last up:

"
....But the common law is not excluded. There is NOTHING in that paper (the Constitution)to warrant the assertion.

As to the exclusion of a jury from the vicinage, he has mistaken the fact. The legislature may direct a jury to come from the vicinage. But the gentleman says that, by this Constitution, they have power to make laws to define crimes and prescribe punishments; and that, consequently, we are not free from torture. Treason against the United States is defined in the Constitution, and the forfeiture limited to the life of the person attainted. Congress have power to define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the laws of nations;
>>>but they "cannot" >>> "define" "or" >>> prescribe  the punishment of "any other crime whatever", without >>> violating the Constitution.

If we had no security against torture but our declaration of rights, we might be tortured to-morrow; for it has been repeatedly infringed and disregarded. A bill of rights is only an acknowledgment of the "preëxisting" claim to rights in the people. They belong to usas much as if they had been inserted in the Constitution.

But it is said that, if it be doubtful, the possibility of dispute ought to be precluded. Admitting it was proper for the Convention to have inserted a bill of rights, it is not proper here to propose it as the condition of our accession to the Union. Would you reject this government for its omission, dissolve the Union, and bring miseries on yourselves and posterity? I hope the gentleman does not oppose it on this ground solely. Is there another reason? He said that it is not only the general wish of this state, but all the states, to have a bill of rights. If it be so, where is the difficulty of having this done by way of subsequent amendment?
(which was done) We shall find the other states willing to accord with their own favorite wish. The gentleman last up says that the power of legislation includes every thing. A general power of legislation does. But this is a "special" power of legislation. Therefore, it does not contain that plenitude of power which he imagines.

>>> They cannot legislate in "any case" but those "particularly enumerated"."


APP Note:  Not in "ANY case".
 


See Also
Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions.

2. Resolved, That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations, and no other crimes, whatsoever; and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," therefore the act of Congress, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, and intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," as also the act passed by them on the day of June, 1798, intituled "An Act to punish frauds committed on the bank of the United States," (and all their other acts which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution,)are altogether VOID, and of NO FORCE; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective States, each within its own territory.



 

American Patriot Party . CCOregon Patriot Party . Com - American Patriot Party.US - Copyright 2006 Richard Taylor

NO PRETENSE OF AUTHORITY OR UNDELEGATED POWERS
NO UNDELEGATED POWERS OUTSIDE THE CONSTITUTION's ORIGINAL COMPACT
NO UNDELEGATED FEDERAL BUREAUCRACIES
NO UNDELEGATED FEDERAL POLICE NO INTERNATIONAL POLICE NO INTERPOL
NO FEDERAL RESERVE NO WORLD BANKS
NO UNITED NATIONS NO WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION NO UN
NO MONUMENTS NO LAND TRUSTS
NO FEDERAL MANDATES
NO FEDERAL LANDS
NO IMMINENT DOMAIN
NO SOCIALISM
NO CONDEMNATION NO IMMINENT DOMAIN
NO EXCLUSIVE PRIVILEGES NO UNIONS NO CORPORATIONS NO SPECIAL INTERESTS
NO INCOME SALES OR PROPERTY TAXES
NO FAIR TAX
NO LIBERAL VS CONSERVATIVE
NOLAN CHART FALACY
NO ZONING


Web Sites and News Links

Visit and join :
The John Birch Society


Visit and Join Ron Paul's
Campaign For Liberty


Voters Market
Political Information


Daily Ron Paul Discussion Forum: http://www.dailypaul.com

Freedom Works Get Connected Site: http://www.connect.freedomworks.com

Freedom Works News: http://www.freedomworks.com

Tea Party Discussion Site: http://teapartypatriots.ning.com


Interesting Links:

Conspiracy http://www.cooperativeindividualism.or g/aier_on_conspiracy_06.html

Conspiracy Theory: http://www.cooperativeindividualism.or g/aier_on_conspiracy_03.html

Visit and Join Aaron Russo's
Restore the Republic
:

Home of END THE FED Organizers

-----------------
 

 WARNING


Note:
That although we quote some research articles from the Heritage Foundation, we are opposed to the Heritage Foundation's leadership that has promoted National ID and the Patriot Act.

This has been brought to our attention.

We suggest not donating to the Heritage Foundation until they reverse their stand on this issue and other issues that promote invasion upon individual Liberties, Rights and Privacy.

While reviewing any videos or information from the Heritage Foundation, beware of the insertion of information not in line with true freedom as defined by the founders or attempts by groups such as the Heritage Foundation that promote "exclusive privileges" as "free trade" under the "guise" of "Freedom of Contract".

Beware
of "Exclusive Privileged" trade, i.e. State born exclusive privileges such as Corporations, Unions, Tax supported Special Interests or Undelegated (under the Original Compact) self perpetuating federal or state bureaucracies; being "passed off" as "Free Trade".

They are Collectives; Cartels and Monopolies; Creating not free trade, but "exclusive privileged trade".

When challenged, fiscal republicans  scream "freedom of contract" ; Which has been corrupted by the addition of the "exclusive privilege" in the form of the corporation, which should not exist in a free country; and should not be or have unlimited grant of contract; as it's whole existence is subject to the general public;

That others can create corporations is no excuse to allow something that "should not exist in the fist place"; Exclusive Privileged Collectives eventually choke out true  free enterprise; Where as independents are crowded out, they tend to migrate to those collectives for survival which worsens the situation.

See
Virginia Declaration of Rights #4; And our 2006 News letter that  presents a full days Constitutional Debate; James Madison in short states "far be it from them to grant exclusive privileges to anyone";

Further, it allows foreign control, through stocks, of American soil and businesses; These subvert the powers of the local legislative, causing dependency of those it employs, to foreign interests; who owe homage to a foreign legislature;

This is against the philosophy of freedom;

See
John Locke regarding Toleration, where citizens owing homage to another entity (power - Pope used as the example back then) gives way to granting that entity soldiers against the local legislative (magistrate) to be stationed within the borders of a Magistrates own Country;

This is opposed to the local legislative which is supposed to be supreme (limited powers granted by the people), to be fully supported by the people and in-turn for the legislative to be fully in defense of the people's local interests and safety;

Weigh all information, carefully.

The Heritage Foundation

LAW of THE SEA TREATY: US SOVEREIGNTY DANGER:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01Ae pYCyzMo&NR=1
 

http://www.heritage.org

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZpV RbRIJOU&feature=user

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tuih HneVK8

You Tube - Heritage main page:
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=H eritageFoundation


You Tube: This Week on the hill :
http://www.youtube.com/results?search _query=this+week+on+the+hill&search =Search


November 12,2007:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nr7pl mAhWTM


Free Congress Foundation

Paul Weyrich on Conservatism; http://www.freecongress.org/commenta ries/2005/050718.aspx

Complete index:
http://www.freecongress.org/commenta ries/2007/nextconservatism.aspx

On Foreign Policy: #6:
http://www.freecongress.org/commenta ries/2005/050823.aspx

Videos:
http://www.fcfnewsondemand.org/defa ult.aspx

Howard Phillips

1.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdhN VpGZzvY

2.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bD2 18X3khc

3.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiuJ7 pZvw8Q

4.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiuP 6W4COu0


Nigel Farage, Britain's Independent Party

Daniel Hannon, Britain's Independent Party

 

News Links




 

ANANOVA
BLOOMBERG
BUSINESS WIRE
DEUTSCHE PRESSE-AGENTUR
DOW JONES
EFE
INDO-ASIAN NEWS SERVICE
INTERFAX
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC WIRE
ITAR-TASS
KYODO
MCCLATCHY [DC]
PRAVDA
PRESS ASSOCIATION
PRESS TRUST INDIA
PR NEWSWIRE
[SHOWBIZ] PR WIRE
SCRIPPS HOWARD
US INFO WIRE
WENN SHOWBIZ
XINHUA
YONHAP


WORLD FRONT PAGES
LOCAL NEWS BY ZIPCODE
TV RATINGS
MOVIE BOXOFFICE RESULTS
ABCNEWS
ACCESS HOLLYWOOD
AD AGE DEADLINE
BBC
BBC AUDIO
BILD
BILLBOARD
BOSTON GLOBE
BOSTON HERALD
BREITBART
BROADCASTING & CABLE
CBS NEWS
C-SPAN
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES
CHICAGO TRIB
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE
CNBC
CNN

DAILY BEAST
DAILY KOS
DAILY SWARM
DAILY VARIETY
DER SPIEGEL
E!
ECONOMIST
EDITOR & PUBLISHER
EMIRATES TODAY
ENT WEEKLY
FINANCIAL TIMES
FORBES
FOXNEWS
FOXNEWS NATION
FREE REPUBLIC
GAWKER
HOT AIR
HELLO!
HILL
H'WOOD REPORTER
HUFFINGTON POST
HUMAN EVENTS
IAFRICA
INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIB
INFOWARS
INVEST BUS DAILY
JERUSALEM POST
LA DAILY NEWS
LA TIMES
LUCIANNE.COM
MEDIA WEEK
MSNBC
NATION
NATIONAL ENQUIRER
NATIONAL REVIEW
NEW REPUBLIC
NEW YORK
NY DAILY NEWS
NY OBSERVER
NY POST
NY TIMES
NEW YORKER
NEWSBUSTERS
NEWSBYTES
NEWSMAX
NEWSWEEK
N. KOREAN NEWS
PEOPLE
PHILLY INQUIRER
PHILLY DAILY NEWS
POLITICO
R & R
RADAR
REAL CLEAR POLITICS
REASON MAG
RED STATE
ROLL CALL
ROLLING STONE
SALON
SAN FRAN CHRON
SEATTLE TIMES
SKY NEWS
SLATE
SMOKING GUN
SPLASH NEWS
STAR
SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
TALKING POINTS MEMO
TIME MAG
TMZ
[U.K.] DAILY MAIL
[U.K.] DAILY MIRROR
DAILY RECORD
[U.K.] EVENING STANDARD
[U.K.] EXPRESS
[U.K.] GUARDIAN
[U.K.] INDEPENDENT
[U.K.] NEWS OF THE WORLD
[U.K.] SUN
[U.K.] TELEGRAPH
US NEWS
USA TODAY
VANITY FAIR
VILLAGE VOICE
WASH EXAMINER
WASH POST
WASH TIMES
WEEKLY STANDARD
WORLDNETDAILY
WOWOWOW
X17






ABCNEWS NOTE
MIKE ALLEN PLAYBOOK
MSNBC FIRST READ
WASH POST RUNDOWN...
MATT DRUDGE

MARC AMBINDER
JONATHAN ALTER
DAVE BARRY
MICHAEL BARONE
STEPHEN BATTAGLIO
GLORIA BORGER
BRENT BOZELL
DAVID BRODER
DAVID BROOKS
PAT BUCHANAN
HOWIE CARR
MONA CHAREN
ELEANOR CLIFT

JOE CONASON
DAVID CORN
ANN COULTER
JIM CRAMER
CRAIG CRAWFORD
STANLEY CROUCH
LOU DOBBS
DE BORCHGRAVE
MAUREEN DOWD
ROGER EBERT
LARRY ELDER
SUSAN ESTRICH
JOSEPH FARAH
SUZANNE FIELDS
HOWARD FINEMAN
NIKKI FINKE
FIRST DRAFT [REUTERS]
FISHBOWL, DC
FISHBOWL, NYC
ROGER FRIEDMAN
JOHN FUND
BILL GERTZ
GEORGIE GEYER
JIM GLASSMAN
JONAH GOLDBERG
ELLEN GOODMAN
MARTIN GROVE
MARK HALPERIN
CARL HIAASEN
NAT HENTOFF
PEREZ HILTON
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS
HUGH HEWITT
INSIDE BELTWAY
INSIDE THE RING
AL KAMEN
MICKEY KAUS
KEITH J. KELLY
MICHAEL KINSLEY
JOE KLEIN
HARRY KNOWLES
KRAUTHAMMER
NICHOLAS KRISTOF
PAUL KRUGMAN
LARRY KUDLOW
HOWIE KURTZ
JOHN LEO
DAVID LIMBAUGH
RUSH LIMBAUGH
HAL LINDSEY
RICH LOWRY
MICHELLE MALKIN
DICK MORRIS
PEGGY NOONAN
OFF THE RECORD
MARVIN OLASKY
BILL O'REILLY
PAGE SIX
CAMILLE PAGLIA
ANDREA PEYSER
JIM PINKERTON
BILL PRESS
WES PRUDEN
ANNA QUINDLEN
FRANK RICH
REX REED
RICHARD REEVES
RELIABLE SOURCE
RICHARD ROEPER
EAGLE FORUM
TOM SHALES
LIZ SMITH
MICHAEL SNEED
JOE SOBRAN
THOMAS SOWELL
MARK STEYN
ANDREW SULLIVAN
HELEN THOMAS
CAL THOMAS
TV COLUMN
TV NEWSER
TV PROGRAMMING INSIDER
VEGAS CONFIDENTIAL
JEFFREY WELLS
WASHINGTON WHISPERS
GEORGE WILL
WALTER WILLIAMS
JAMES WOLCOTT
MORT ZUCKERMAN
BILL ZWECKER




Revised: May/June -97,000 jobs than first reported...






Taliban murders 6 American missionaries...

Scientists find sea sponges share human genes...
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE

REUTERS DIGEST
REUTERS WORLD

REUTERS POLITICS

UPI

GOOGLE NEWS

RECENT DRUDGE HEADLINES...
WEATHER ACTION


THE LIST...

DRUDGE ARCHIVES

DRUDGE REFERENCE DESK

 

AllSouthwest News
AP WORLD
AP NATIONAL
AP WASHINGTON
ABC NEWS
APFN
BBC
BBC AUDIO
BILLBOARD
BOSTON GLOBE
BROADCASTING
 
& CABLE
CBS NEWS
C-SPAN  SCHEDULE
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
CHICAGO
 
SUN-TIMES
CHRISTIAN
 
SCIENCE
 
MONITOR
DRUDGE REPORT
JOURNALIST'S EXPRESS
NATION
NATIONAL
 
ENQUIRER
NATIONAL REVIEW
THE NEW AMERICAN
NEW REPUBLIC
NY DAILY NEWS
NY OBSERVER
NY POST
NY TIMES
NEW YORKER
NEWSBYTES
NEWSMAX
NEWSWEEK
R & R ONLINE
eTOPIX NEWSWIRE
UPI WIRE
UPI NATIONAL
UPI WORLD
AP/REUTERS PHOTO
 
WIRE
REUTERS ROUNDUP
REUTERS SPOTLIGHT
REUTERS WORLD
REUTERS POLITICS
REUTERS ODD
CNN
CNN TRANSCRIPTS
CONSERVATIVE NEWS SVC
DEBKA
D.C. DAYBOOK
ELECTRONIC MEDIA
EMERGENCY NET
ENTERTAINMENT
 
WEEKLY
FINANCIAL TIMES
FORBES MAG
FOX NEWS
FREE REPUBLIC
GAMLA
REASON MAGAZINE
ROLL CALL
SKY NEWS
STAR
TIME MAG
USA DAILY
[U.K.] DAILY MIRROR
DAILY RECORD
[U.K.] EVENING STANDARD
[U.K.] EXPRESS
[U.K.] GUARDIAN
[U.K.] INDEPENDENT
AP WORLD
AP NATIONAL
AP WASHINGTON
AP BREAKING
ARUTZ SHEVA
HA' ARETZ
HILLNEWS
HUMAN EVENTS
INSIGHT MAG
INTERNAT'L
 
HERALD TRIBUNE
INVEST BUS DAILY
JERUSALEM POST
JERUSALEM TIMES
JEWISH WORLD
REVIEW
JUDICIAL WATCH
LA DAILY NEWS
MSNBC
MUCHMUSIC
[U.K.] NEWS OF THE WORLD
U.K. PRESS PAPERS
[U.K.] STAR
[U.K.] SUN
U.K. TABLOIDS
[U.K.] TELEGRAPH
[U.K.] TIMES
UNION LEADER
US NEWS
USA TODAY
WASH TIMES
WEEKLY STANDARD
WORLDNETDAILY

 

 

 


American Patriot Party and Oregon Patriot Party Return Links

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_P atriot_Party
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_polit ical_parties_in_Oregon


Indirect links

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_polit ical_parties_in_the_United_States
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_Party
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_col o ur
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution _ Party_%28United_States%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservativ e_political_parties
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservativ e _Political_Parties
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_t he_United_States#See_also
http://wikitest.electorama.com/wiki/Ame rican_Patriot_Party

Google:
http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache: N1j_rIYuieAJ:www.windsorct.org/whsal ex/documents/PoliticalPartiesAnalysisx tra.doc+americanpatriotparty.cc&hl=en & ct=clnk&cd=19&gl=us

En Pediax:

http://en.pediax.org/Jeffersonian_politic al_philosophy

Tutor Gig:

http://www.tutorgig.com/ed/Freedom_(p olitical)
http://www.tutorgig.com/ed/patriot

Vote Smart:

http://www.vote-smart.org/resource_pol itical_resources.php?category=1

Liberty Post:

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readar t .cgi?ArtNum=184251&Disp=Refresh&
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readar t .cgi?ArtNum=189681
http://69.55.11.240/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? A rtNum=177993

Sons of Liberty:

http://www.americansonsofliberty.com/ cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=11742438 68
http://www.americansonsofliberty.com/ cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?action=print;nu m= 1063512821

God Guns and Glory:
http://godgunsglory.com/2005/08/26/a- post-i-am-working-on-throughout-the-d ay/

Push Hamburger:

http://www.pushhamburger.com/politic al_parties.htm

California Patriot Blog:

http://www.californiapatriot.org/blog/200 7/03/20/asuc-candidates-meeting/

Third Party News.Net:

http://www.aboutus.org/ThirdPartyNews .net

lswhs.leesummit:

http://lswhs.leesummit.k12.mo.us/npar r ish/PoliticalpartiesintheUS.htm


Action.Org:

http://www.acton.org/ppolicy/comment/ article.php?id=41

IPL (Internet Public Library).Org:

http://www.ipl.org/div/searchresults/det ail?words=human+rights&coll=gen
http://www.ipl.org/div/subject/browse/la w30.10.20/

Libre Opinion:

http://libreopinion.com/members/patriot list/states/oregon.html

Domain Tools:

http://www.domaintools.com/en/Americ an_Patriot_Party

Citizen Sites:

http://www.citizenship-sites.com/