American Patriot Party Official National Web Site, American Patriot Party National Campaign and Elections Headquarters, Oregon Patriot Party, The American Patriot Party State of Oregon Web Site, State of Oregon Elections Division History, Oregon State Elections Division, Oregon Political Parties List and Comparison Chart and Graph, Political Party of Oregon, US Political Education, US Pacific Commander Education, Anti Federalists USA Patriots News, American Patriot Party National and State Headquarters News in Medford Oregon, Ashland Oregon , True Thomas Jeffersonian Democratic Republicans Party, Oregon State American Patriot Party of American Patriots, Ron Paul, Tea Party, Tea Party Patriots, Won Caucus Straw Poll Results, Delegates Winner, Ron Paul for President 2012, President and Presidential Primaries News, Who is Running for President, Mitt Romney, Barack Obama
Patriot News
Patriot Party
American Patriot Party, State Elections
                          Division Candidates Oregon State
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Political Party Patriots 1.jpg
Another Arm THIN BANNER.jpg

American Patriot MILITIA.jpg

American Patriot Party, State
                                    Elections Division Candidates Oregon
American Patriot Wiki 1.jpg
American Patriot Party 7.jpg
American Party Peoples.jpg
Wikipedia Patriot Patriot.jpg
Voting Third Party.jpg
Secretary of State Of.jpg
American Elections Wiki.jpg
Patriot Party Parties.jpg
American Elections Cr.jpg
American Elections Ct.jpg
Division of Power.jpg
Fundamental Laws of
Republics and Represention.jpg
Privileges and Contracts.jpg
True American Patriotism.jpg
Freedom Opinion Consent.jpg
Socialism Defined Am
Slavery American Patriots.jpg
Voluntary Slavery.jpg
Existence of Slavery.jpg
Distant Legislatures.jpg
Wards of the State.jpg
Enterprises of Ambition.jpg
Pretense of Authority.jpg
States Liberty Bill.jpg
APP A TAX - Anonymity Tax.jpg
County Secession
Two Candidate Vote Option.jpg
Magna Carta 1215.jpg
English Bill of Rights
John Locke Tolleration
John Locke Treatise Civil.jpg
Rights of the
Witherspoon Confederation.jpg
VA Declaration of Rights.jpg
Witherspoon Providence
Declaration of
Articles of Confederation.jpg
MS Declaration of Rights.jpg
Founders Letters of Intent.jpg
Ratifying Conventions 1788.jpg
US Constitutional Compaign.jpg
Bill of Rights &
American Patriot Party 9.jpg
APP Opposition Issues
APP Special Reports.jpg
APP Commentary &
APP Internet Posts
APP Cartoons &
American Patriot Party 6.jpg
American Patriot Party 3.jpg
APP YouTube Video Choices.jpg
State Party Organization.jpg
American Patriots Election.jpg
American Patriot Party 5.jpg
What Makes Us Different.jpg
American Elections Wi.jpg
APP Products &
American Patriot Party
APP Graphics Logo &
American Patriot Party 8.jpg
University of Chicago
Cornell University Federal.jpg
Federal Law Reference.jpg
Federal Law Research.jpg
Federal Regulations Code.jpg
American Patriot Party 4.jpg
Armory Arms Firearms Sales
American Offense Defense.jpg
APP Communication
APP Defense Preparedness.jpg
Sampson & Redoubt
Self Sufficiency.jpg
APP Volunteer Patriots.jpg
International Independence.jpg































APP Opposition Groups:

    Southern Poverty Law Center - The Center for Propaganda for Socialism in America which opposes CITIZEN MILITIAS

    This is in Opposition of the Constitution as it was written and against the principles of Common Law... A REVERSE HATE GROUP -


    SPL #1 patriot-movement

         This group say they want to protect  on one hand - but then allow the deviant of society to brain wash and then misuse others or each other outside the Laws of Nature; Allowing for the existence of Voluntary Slavery  and Slavery - Through the relinquishment of inalienable rights. This Group, Communist / Socialist in nature,  places a form of "Subjugated Peace" under a central national government;  Instead of abiding by the True Principles of Freedom established in small well represented and independent republics;

    John Locke with regard to such a "peace"  word search LAMB on his Second Treatise on Civil Government.

    They are a proponent of reverse hate; and are a proponent for the use of National Federal force, accumulated by government "laws" which have been created without authority  - i.e. under the

    See Virginia Resolution, James Madison, denouncing when the government makes itself, and not the Constitution the Measure of its powers.









True Patriot The Official.jpg

George Mason  6-16-1788: Who are the MILITIA? They consist NOW of the "WHOLE PEOPLE"..." See quotes and source link regarding MILITIAS at bottom of this page.





Newsmax News Today
                                              Trump Pence 2020
  News You Can Trust
 Britain People Loose Gun Rights  People loosing Gun Rights    Australians Loose Gun Rights   Armed Switzerland Lowest Crime Rate In World

Remember that we are a nation of Independent State Republics of Constitutional laws based upon the Laws of Nature and NOT just any law that is passed by federal or state legislatures.

Thomas Jefferson: "Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law', because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual~~"

Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky Resolutions, 1798:

#3. " Resolved, That it is true as a general principle, and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the Constitutions, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, our prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, OR to the People"; and that NO power over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, and were reserved to the States or the People: that thus was manifested their determination to retain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated, rather than the use be destroyed. And thus also they guarded against ALL abridgment by the United States of the freedom of religious opinions and exercises, and retained to themselves the right of protecting the same, as this State, by a law passed on the general demand of its citizens, had already protected them from "ALL" human restraint or interference. And that in addition to this general principle and express declaration, another and more special provision has been made by one of the amendments to the Constitution, which expressly declares, that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press": thereby guarding in the same sentence, and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press: insomuch, that whatever violated either, throws down the sanctuary which covers the others, arid that libels, falsehood, and defamation, equally with heresy and false religion, are WITHHELD from the cognizance of federal tribunals. That, therefore, the act of Congress of the United States, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," which does abridge the freedom of the press, is "NOT LAW", but is "ALTOGETHER" "VOID", and of "NO FORCE". ..."

Get the word "Democracy" out of your vocabulary when describing the United States; we are Independent Republics, based upon the Laws of Nature. Democracy in our governments are limited to those principles; limited to delegated powers and defined. "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". That right cannot be voted away by state or federal legislatures. Any "law" to do so, as clearly established by the Founders, is "NOT LAW", but is "ALTOGETHER" "VOID", and of "NO FORCE". ...". "The right of self preservation is the First Law of Nature", Samuel Adams, Absolute Rights of the Colonists, 1772. See Federalist #46 and James Madison's 25 to 1 Power Ratio - Citizens militia over military, below on this page.

  NEWS:  1 Sydney Powell 270 Page PDF Court Election Fraud Evidence Document
                3. Sample of Recent Election Fraud Cases from Across the United States
                4. NTD News - Leak - Twitter CEO Plots Further Against 1st Amendment  
Republicans vow make illegitimate Biden/Harris administration a nightmare. 
                6. NATO Controlling What You Hear and See - Directs Twitter and Facebook
                7. Govenor Abbott Talks Border Security, Drug Cartels, Biden's Failures
                8. Democrats Attack Constitutionally Guaranteed Freedoms
9. Tenth Amendment Center - Nullify Federal Gun Control Now
              10. Tenth Amendment Center - The Tenth Amendment
              11. China: Power and Prosperity -- Watch the full documentary
              12. Europe EU (i.e. German Socialist Party)  and Australia sell out to China
                     America against Xi's China: Struggle for supremacy? - To The Point

              13. Always Needed Old News: Ron Paul on Auditing the Federal Reserve ... Then Ending the Federal Reserve
Always Needed Old News: Dr. Rand Paul: Time for Congress to Pass ‘Audit the Fed’
15. "SEVEN" Coming Soon
              16. Ron Paul Message Even More Valid Today
              17. Tucker on Joe on BitChute - Liberty Channel - Mark Steyn - Guest (bookmark this and our alternate news channels below)

Founder's Warning Come True - Regarding Washington DC, White House and Legislature:

Patrick Henry: "....The  people within that place (Washington, DC), and the strongholds, may be excused from all the  burdens imposed on the rest of the society, and may enjoy exclusive emoluments,  to the great injury of the rest of the people.  But gentlemen say that the power will not he abused.  They ought to show that it is necessary.  All their powers may be fully carried into execution, without this exclusive authority in the 'ten miles square' (Washington, DC).  The sweeping clause will fully enable them to do what they please.  What could the most extravagant and boundless imagination ask, but power to do every thing? 

I have reason to suspect ambitious grasps at power.  The experience of the world teaches me the jeopardy of giving enormous power.  Strike this clause out of the form of the government, and how will it stand?  Congress will still have power, by the sweeping clause, to make laws within that {438} place and the strong holds, independently of the local authority of the state.  I ask you, if this clause be struck out, whether the sweeping clause will not enable them to protect themselves from insult.  If you grant them these powers, you destroy "every degree of responsibility".  They will fully screen them from justice, and preclude the possibility of punishing  them.  No instance can be given of such a wanton grasp of power as an exclusive  legislation in all cases whatever. ..."  Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788


The American Patriot Party continues to endorse Donald J. Trump for President 2024 for his hard work, sacrifice and devotion to restoring Constitutional Principles to the United States during his first 4 year term. Seldom do you see someone so actively focused on that goal and the advancement of justice for all. American Patriot Party finds that our goal of returning the principles envisioned by our Founding Fathers is well served by the re-election of Donald J. Trump for President 2024!

***Congratulations Donald Trump for yours and America's 2020 Election Win! (despite the corruption now afoot)


Break the Bonds of Censorship
Add American Patriot Party: and
in all your email posts and web posts

------    Join the Fastest Growing Third Party and Become a Member!   ------             

                                                                                                                APP IS ON PARLER                                                                

Join the APP for 2021...

Welcome to the American Patriot Party, the Patriots who follow the original intent of the Founding Fathers:

1.) Strong States as Intended.
2.) Smaller States for Adequate Representation as the Constitution Prescribes, limiting Power of
      Distant Legislatures.
3.) Stronger Smaller Counties for Local Control.
4.) Limiting the Federal Government to the Delegated Powers of the Original Constitutional Compact:

James Madison
- Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:

...I cannot comprehend that the (VERY LIMITED FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE) power of legislating over a "SMALL DISTRICT", which "CANNOT EXCEED" "TEN MILES SQUARE", and may "NOT BE MORE" THAN "ONE MILE", will involve the dangers which he (Patrick Henry) apprehends. ..."

APP: Think long and hard about that statement.

George Mason, Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:

"...But I wish a clause in the Constitution, with respect to ALL POWERS which are NOT granted (DELEGATED), that they are RETAINED by the STATES. OTHERWISE, the power of providing for the "GENERAL WELFARE" may be "



Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, over 3000 professionals and many thousands more national - international supporters and growing.

American Architects & Engineers
World Trade Center Building #7.

Join A&E at

Note: If this video above is taken down (again) by YouTube, do a search for Ed Asner 9-11
Solving the Mysteries of WTC World Trade Center #7 to view it until we re-post or
view similar videos at

Experts Speak Out
- Controlled Demolition is Fact on World Trade Center Buildings #1, #2 & #7

See also
Peter Michael Ketcham video 14 year NIST Employee (beginning at 1997):

See more videos on 911:  Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth:

Over 3,000 people died on 911 and no investigations as to what the people and businesses associated with them were involved with... If even one person was murdered in this same city, what that one person may have been involved in would be thoroughly investigated. 3000 + people are murdered, and there is nothing said about the activities of any of the victims or the companies associated with them.

Manipulation of National Currency, Foreign Currency and Trade can produce serious consequences; As clearly seen with the "Federal Reserve" investing in Foreign Banks,
all without transparent Civilian or Legislative oversight to scrutinize poor investments or, more importantly, corruption;

Result: We are now 1.264 TRILLION DOLLARS in Debt to China alone (see article below); Our country is now quaking from the International debt caused by poor legislative governing of American Tax Dollars, poor corporate investments, and corruption associated with those investments;

Building 7 held many records of those companies involved in the World Trade Center. The video recording of the firemen indicating that the building was going to be purposely collapsed is clear; The way the building falls is unquestionable.

The American Patriot Party promotes having a thorough investigation, not only of the buildings, but of the business activities of the victims and those associated with the victims; of the companies and their activities, and of all things leading up to the collapse; to find out what actually occurred, both for the families of the victims and the country.

Watch and listen to this video with it's many professionals. Then you decide.

Join: Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth:

Sign the Petition

Watch British Police Attack their Own
Simply for Wanting British Law Upheld -
Western Sharia Police:

See Also:

Islamic Britain: The TRUTH About
o Go Zones

OAN Report: Grenade Attacks, rape and crime in
increase in Sweden:

The Muslim Refugee Rape Epidemic:
Coming to America? Michelle Malkin

Europe and British Islamic Mosques
Teach Worshipers to Kill Others.

Dispatches - Undercover Mosque:
The Return - Real Stories

Dispatches Undercover Mosque - Real Stories (1)

Dispatches - Undercover Mosque The Return - Real Stories (2)

Germany Erupts Into Chaos As Protesters Declare
"Rapefugees Not Welcome" - Cologne NYE


American Patriot - Ezra Taft Benson
Warning: "Sta
nd up for Freedom".

‪American Patriot Video Archive:
Ezra Taft Benson - 1of2 Globalist Bankers
Tactic to Stifle Freedom and American Patriot Movements in America‬

American Patriot Video Archive: Ezra Taft Benson - 2of2 Globalist Bankers
Tactic to Stifle Freedom and American Patriot Movements in America.


John Birch Society's eye opening Video against the SPLC Southern Poverty Law Center
showing the SPLC
Southern Poverty Law Center to be a socialist organization spreading
hate against the original Constitution and those true American Patriots supporting it;
That the SPLC does this by comparing true American Patriots which they hate with criminal
organizations - See
again Ezra Taft Benson's Warning Video above of socialist backed
organizations creating "confusion followed by delusion"


Informative Alternate News Websites:

         One America News Network (OAN):

        Alex Jones - Info Wars:
Alt Censored:
        Daily Motion:
        Vice News:
        Bit Chute:

         Ron Paul - Liberty Channel:
         Ben Swann - Truth in Media:
        *The Constitution Society -
        *The Tenth Amendment Center - Michael Boldin -

*Must view


American Patriot Party informative Videos On MEWE

upport the American Patriot Party:

Free Membership:

Donate and support the American Patriot Party today!:

We also strongly advocate supporting

John Birch Society:

Constitution Society:
for their vast available free records and documents of the Founders.

The Tenth Amendment Center: Great video activist
educational and teaching network.


American Patriot Party Suggested Reading:

1.) Virginia & Kentu
cky Resolutions, 1798 - James Madison & Thomas Jefferson 

2.) Virginia Ratifying Convention, 6-16-1778 - Numerous Founders

3.) Absolute Rights of the Colonists, 1772 - Samuel Adams

4.) Second Treatise on Civil Government, 1689 - John Locke

When you have studied these pages you can begin to understand freedom and
limited government.

Our ability to educate others depends on support from citizens promoting freedom
like you.

Support the only party that actually follows the Constitution as it was intended.

No other party or organization will do this, not one.

Compare us to other parties:
The American Patriot Party believes in Constitutional and Common Law Carry of arms for bearing and concealment; for preservation of self, family, community, freedoms, liberties and property.
the Founders hid their cannons, munitions and arms from their government, clearly indicating concealment without registration is an inalienable right: See Federalist #46 and James Madison's 25 to 1 Power Ratio - Citizens militia over military, below on this page. A Constitutional minimum ratio the NRA cowers from upholding.



13 States are already unrestricted, Oklahoma and Texas are on their way, how about your state?
                                                          MACHINE GUN

Yes, they did have guns like that in 1776.  Above is the 1718 Puckle Machine Gun, 73 years BEFORE the Second Amendment!

Watch Video of this gun:

Two of these weapons were purchased (without government registration as with all gun purchases at that time) from Puckle, himself a citizen attorney inventor, by
the 2nd Duke of Montagu.

George Washington's call for the CITIZENS to manufacture and have readily at hand military grade weaponry
First Annual Message to Congress, January 8, 1790 for the defense of their freedoms and liberties. See Quotes Below on this page.

The American Patriot Party supports formation and armament of Citizens Militias (all citizens) as intended by the Founders. It is the responsibility of the states and federal government to train and arm the Citizen militias (See: Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788); Once trained, military members of the US armed forces have the duty to continue their service as members of the citizen militia where they reside with those that have not had military service, work to train them, and to take their place as James Madison indicates in Federalist #46 as a opposing force to the standing military they once served as well as that of foreign aggression; This is to balance and check the power of our limited government(s). This is not a anti-government stand, or anti-military stand; this is a Constitutional check against the misuse of power by governments acting under a pretense of authority and outside those limited delegated powers given them. Note that if the federal government fails to arm and train the citizens, it is the right and duty of the state, local communities and or citizens to do so - including the right to import arms; including to import arms outside the federal pretense of control - which by the Bill of Rights 2nd Amendment, the federal government has no control regarding arms
(See: Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788).

George Mason Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788: "...His fears, as he had before expressed, were, that grievous punishments (LAWS and Laws against guns etc.) would be inflicted, in order to render the service disagreeable to the (Citizen) militia themselves, and induce them to wish its abolition, which would afford a PRETENSE for establishing a standing army. ..." (APP Note: This has already happened);

John Marshall: "....If Congress neglect our militia (citizens), "we can arm them OURSELVES". CANNOT (the state and or people of) Virginia "import arms? Cannot she put them into the hands of  "HER" militia-men? He then concluded by observing, that the power of governing the militia was NOT vested in the states by implication, because, being "possessed of it"  "antecedent to the adoption of the government, and "not being divested of it" by any grant or restriction in the Constitution, they must necessarily be as "FULLY possessed of it as ever they had been.> And it could NOT be said that the states derived ANY powers from that (the federal government or Constitution) system, "but RETAINED them," >>>>>>>>"though not acknowledged in ANY part of it". "

See F
ederalist  #46 - James Madison: A 25 to 1 Civilian Power Ratio
the Standing Army (MILITARY) is the "minimum power ratio" in any free country and the true definition of what a MILITIA is.

".....The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.

(The United States Military) WOULD BE "OPPOSED" A (CITIZEN) "MILITIA" amounting to near half a million of "CITIZENS" with "ARMS IN THEIR HANDS", OFFICERED BY MEN CHOSEN FROM "AMONG THEMSELVES" (CHOSEN BY THE LOCAL CITIZEN'S - NOT MILITARY OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT - THE TRUE DEFINITION OF MILITIA ), fighting for their (THE CITIZEN'S) common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their (THE CITIZEN MILITIA'S) affections and confidence.

It may well be doubted, whether a (CITIZEN) MILITIA "thus circumstanced" (25 to 1  ARMED POWER RATIO) could ever be conquered by such a (SMALL) proportion of "regular troops" (i.e. federal US ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINES). ...."

Read Federalist #46 in full below on this page
.... Get educated.

To send support, see our Donations page:


Ben Swann - Truth in Media: WHO Created ISIS:

UPDATED - Video Links
- The Truth Behind ISIS | WUWE: 1.)


3.) Christians fight back:
Christians forming militias to fight against ISIS – Middle East advocate:

4.) US Creates ISIS -
Ben Swann's Reality Check - The U.S. Government Created Al Qaeda:


1. Freedom of Speech Under Attack by Paul Joseph Watson:


World Immigration News and Related Videos - a MUST READ!:

When governments deny the existence of a radical violent religious culture and devious acts of war;  and not only invite it, but inject it, into their country.

War is imminent when the governments establish the condition of it.

John Locke, "Second Treatise on Civil Government 1698"

Chapter 19: Of the Dissolution of Government

HE that will, with any clearness, speak of the dissolution of government, ought in the first place to distinguish between the dissolution of the society and the dissolution of the government..."

#217. Fourthly
, the delivery also of the people into the subjection of a foreign power, either by the prince or by the legislative, is certainly a change of the legislative, and so a dissolution of the government. For the end why people entered into society being to be preserved one entire, free, independent society to be governed by its own laws, this is lost whenever they are given up into the power of another. ..."

Read John Locke "Second Treatise on Civil Government 1689" and so that you can understand the principles of toleration that the Governments of Europe, Britain and the United States have quite apparently forgot.

Toleration has limits.

John Locke on Treatise on Toleration:

"...#71. Again: That Church can have no right to be tolerated by the magistrate which is constituted upon such a bottom that all those who enter into it do thereby ipso facto deliver themselves up to the protection and service of another prince. For by this means the magistrate would give way to the settling of a foreign jurisdiction in his own country and suffer his own people to be listed, as it were, for soldiers against his own Government. Nor does the frivolous and fallacious distinction between the Court and the Church afford any remedy to this inconvenience; especially when both the one and the other are equally subject to the absolute authority of the same person, who has not only power to persuade the members of his Church to whatsoever he lists, either as purely religious, or in order thereunto, but can also enjoin it them on pain of eternal fire. It is ridiculous for any one to profess himself to be a Mahometan only in his religion, but in everything else a faithful subject to a Christian magistrate, whilst at the same time he acknowledges himself bound to yield blind obedience to the Mufti of Constantinople, who himself is entirely obedient to the Ottoman Emperor and frames the feigned oracles of that religion according to his pleasure. But this Mahometan living amongst Christians would yet more apparently renounce their government if he acknowledged the same person to be head of his Church who is the supreme magistrate in the state.

#72. Lastly, those are not at all to be tolerated who deny the being of a God. Promises, covenants, and oaths, which are the bonds of human society, can have no hold upon an atheist. The taking away of God, though but even in thought, dissolves all; besides also, those that by their atheism undermine and destroy all religion, can have no pretence of religion whereupon to challenge the privilege of a toleration. As for other practical opinions, though not absolutely free from all error, if they do not tend to establish domination over others, or civil impunity to the Church in which they are taught, there can be no reason why they should not be tolerated.

#73. It remains that I say something concerning those assemblies which, being vulgarly called and perhaps having sometimes been conventicles and nurseries of factions and seditions, are thought to afford against this doctrine of toleration. But this has not happened by anything peculiar unto the genius of such assemblies, but by the unhappy circumstances of an oppressed or ill-settled liberty. These accusations would soon cease if the law of toleration were once so settled that all Churches were obliged to lay down toleration as the foundation of their own liberty, and teach that liberty of conscience is every man's natural right, equally belonging to dissenters as to themselves; and that nobody ought to be compelled in matters of religion either by law or force. The establishment of this one thing would take away all ground of complaints and tumults upon account of conscience; and these causes of discontents and animosities being once removed, there would remain nothing in these assemblies that were not more peaceable and less apt to produce disturbance of state than in any other meetings whatsoever. But let us examine particularly the heads of these accusations. "..."


Samuel Adams in "The Absolute Rights of the Colonists, 1772" summarizes these limits:

Samuel Adams: "In regard to Religeon, mutual tolleration in the different professions thereof, is what all good and candid minds in all ages have ever practiced; and both by precept and example inculcated on mankind: And it is now generally agreed among christians that this spirit of toleration in the fullest extent consistent with the being of civil society "is the chief characteristical mark of the true church"1 & In so much that "Mr. Locke" has asserted, and "proved beyond the possibility of contradiction on any solid ground", that such toleration ought to be extended to all whose doctrines are not subversive of society. The only Sects which he thinks ought to be, and which by all wise laws are excluded from such toleration, are those who teach Doctrines subversive of the Civil Government under which they live. The Roman Catholicks or Papists are excluded by reason of such Doctrines as these "that Princes excommunicated may be deposed, and those they call Hereticks may be destroyed without mercy; besides their recognizing the Pope in so absolute a manner, in subversion of Government, by introducing as far as possible into the states, under whose protection they enjoy life, liberty and property, that solecism in politicks, Imperium in imperio2 (i.e. a Government within a Government) leading directly to the worst anarchy and confusion, civil discord, war and blood shed-- "

This limitation was called for because as Locke presented, following a religious leader from another country (at that time Popes that would have people killed in other countries for heresy) is like having a foreign soldiers following the orders of foreign leaders in your local state and community.

Freedom relies on a set of defined principles based upon the "Laws of Nature" and local interests of local communities for the purpose of local commonwealths; Not distant legislators or leaders.

John Locke: "Chapter 2: "...Of the State of Nature 4. To understand political power aright, and derive it from its original, we must consider what estate all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of Nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man. A state also of equality, wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one having more than another, there being nothing more evident than that creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of Nature, and the use of the same faculties, should also be equal one amongst another, without subordination or subjection,..."

6. But though this be a state of liberty, yet it is not a state of license; though man in that state have an uncontrollable liberty to dispose of his person or possessions, yet he has not liberty to destroy himself, or so much as any creature in his possession, but where some nobler use than its bare preservation calls for it. The "State of Nature" has a "Law of Nature" to govern it, which obliges every one, and REASON, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions; for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent and infinitely wise Maker; all the servants of one sovereign Master, sent into the world by His order and about His business; they are His property, whose workmanship they are made to last during His, not one another's pleasure.

And, being furnished with like faculties, sharing all in one community of Nature, there cannot be supposed any such subordination among us that may authorise us to destroy one another, as if we were made for one another's uses, as the inferior ranks of creatures are for ours. Every one as he is bound to preserve himself, and not to quit his station wilfully, so by the like reason, when his own preservation comes not in competition, ought he as much as he can to preserve the rest of mankind, and not unless it be to do justice on an offender, take away or impair the life, or what tends to the preservation of the life, the liberty, health, limb, or goods of another.

7. And that all men may be restrained from invading others' rights, and from doing hurt to one another, and the law of Nature be observed, which willeth the peace and preservation of all mankind, the execution of the law of Nature is in that state put into every man's hands, whereby every one has a right to punish the transgressors of that law to such a degree as may hinder its violation. For the Law of Nature would, as all other laws that concern men in this world, be in vain if there were nobody that in the State of Nature had a power to execute that law, and thereby preserve the innocent and restrain offenders; and if any one in the state of Nature may punish another for any evil he has done, every one may do so. For in that state of perfect equality, where naturally there is no superiority or jurisdiction of one over another, what any may do in prosecution of that law, every one must needs have a right to do.

8. And thus, in the state of Nature, one man comes by a power over another, but yet no absolute or arbitrary power to use a criminal, when he has got him in his hands, according to the passionate heats or boundless extravagancy of his own will, but only to retribute to him so far as calm reason and conscience dictate, what is proportionate to his transgression, which is so much as may serve for reparation and restraint. For these two are the only reasons why one man may lawfully do harm to another, which is that we call punishment. In transgressing the law of Nature, the offender declares himself to live by another rule than that of reason and common equity, which is that measure God has set to the actions of men for their mutual security, and so he becomes dangerous to mankind; the tie which is to secure them from injury and violence being slighted and broken by him, which being a trespass against the whole species, and the peace and safety of it, provided for by the law of Nature, every man upon this score, by the right he hath to preserve mankind in general, may restrain, or where it is necessary, destroy things noxious to them, and so may bring such evil on any one who hath transgressed that law, as may make him repent the doing of it, and thereby deter him, and, by his example, others from doing the like mischief. And in this case, and upon this ground, every man hath a right to punish the offender, and be executioner of the law of Nature."

The Principle of Freedom added by Samuel Adams is this: "If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the [Volume 5, Page 396] right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave--"

This is the most important addition to the definition of true freedom, as no individual can give up the laws of nature and allow himself to give up (voluntary slavery), or allow others to accept his relinquishment (Slavery), of those rights to any one, or any religion, or any government, or any leader; Period.

Freedom requires consent, but you cannot consent to give up any inalienable right that keeps you free.

Here are a few videos taken from Youtube for your review and see if you can recognize that there are those that will misuse freedom to take away your freedoms.

Ron Paul had the correct statement to our military presence in Iraq; "We marched them over there, we can march them back";

And ask yourself regarding the below videos, would not the same answer by reversing the actions of governments that created this problem be the solution; and let them improve their own countries to their liking if that is what they truly wish to do.

This has nothing to do with racism; it has to do with freedom and free societies vs a religion that does not respect or recognize either; and mirrors the condition that old world Catholics and Papists imposed on those that sought refuge in the new world from religious persecution. 

It is also about governments whose purpose is to protect private property, vacating that purpose by placing huge tax burdens
upon the properties, society and earnings of its citizens. This change of purpose is, by all definitions of civil society and explained by John Locke, an act of war against their own citizens; and can in no way be an act of a representative government:

John Locke Second Treatise on Civil Government:

Locke: " #222. The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their property; and the end while they choose and authorise a legislative is that there may be laws made, and rules set, as guards and fences to the properties of all the society, to limit the power and moderate the dominion of every part and member of the society. For since it can never be supposed to be the will of the society that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which every one designs to secure by entering into society, and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making: whenever the legislators endeavour to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence. Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition, fear, folly, or corruption,...

(APP Note: See this in Samuel Adams Statement within the Rights of the Colonists, 1772:  "If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave.")

...endeavour to grasp themselves, or "put into the hands of any other" (which they do when they force support of immigrants from the money derived from their citizens property and labor), an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people, by this "breach of trust" they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the people, who have a right to resume their original liberty, and by the establishment of a new legislative (such as they shall think fit), provide for their own safety and security, (APP Note: See this in the Declaration of Independence) which is the end for which they are in society...."

Macron sets stage for a French civil war and promotes a EU army to subdue it.

As Germany wreaths from the agony of EU mandated uncontrolled mass immigration and president Merkels disregaurd to it's citizen's anguish of the establishment and digging in of Islamic fundamentalists, French president Macron, French socialist, takes strides in destroying his own country to step up in power in the European Union (EU); Favoring mass immigration and ignoring the cries of his French countrymen.


Make no mistake, this is and has always been a religious war.
The Muslim plan, as you will see in these videos from their own words
is to use population as a weapon to take over the countries they have
been allowed to infiltrate.

Bone chilling speech about threat of Islam in Europe

Must See! Crazy European Immigration Crisis
(this link has been consistently Removed from Youtube - Please Copy Video)
New Link:

Europe’s migration crisis may swing Sweden to the right:

Europe’s migration crisis may swing Sweden to the right:

Crime spike in Germany puts pressure on immigration policy
Time for Reverse Migration Policy

Resentment grows between Christians and Muslims in France

Why the Muslim Religion is and will always be so incompatible with Christian countries:

Islam and British values - The Big Questions with Adam Deen

Storming Spain's Razor-Wire Fence: Europe Or Die (Episode 1/4)


Germany Erupts Into Chaos As Protesters Declare "Rapefugees Not Welcome" - Cologne NYE

Anti-Islamist Riots in Germany: Hooligans Against Salafists

Anti-Islamists Demonstrate in Britain:

Sweden Migrant Crisis - Sweden is a Puppy that does not know it is playing with a Tiger.

FOX NEWS: Migrants to Sweden and all of Europe Invite Civil War from culture clash:

Sweeds expossed to Multiculturism:"

JBS Word to the wise regarding ANTIFA, Alt Right and Antifa protests.

On YouTube:

American Patriot Party is now posting on FACEBOOK with informative videos and insight to today's issues and events.

Remember to share our Facebook link, our articles and "LIKE" our page before returning! Help spread the word. Educate Yourself to the Constitution as it is correctly defined by the Founders in the Ratifying Conventions; Then Educate Others!


WARNING: United Nations attempting to control United States Citizen's Sovereignty again in:


The United Nations is acting as a DISTANT LEGISLATURE to assume power over sovereign nations and remove power from citizens and place them under the direction and power of those people directing and controlling the United Nations.

Remember, ruling by Distant Legislatures, collectivism, socialism and creating dependency are what endanger our freedom's and liberties, as there can be NO representation by Distant Legislatures:

Samuel Adams, Absolute Rights of the Colonists, 1772:
In Full:

".....Now what liberty can there be, where property is taken away without "consent"?

Can it be said with any colour of truth and Justice, that this Continent of three thousand miles in length, and a breadth as yet unexplored, in which however, its supposed, there are five millions of people, has the least voice, vote or influence in the decisions of the British Parliament? Have they, all together, any more right or power to return a single member to that house of commons, who have not inadvertently, but DELIBERATELY assumed a power to dispose of their lives, 8 Liberties and properties, than to choose an Emperor of China! Had the Colonists a right to return members to the British parliament, it would only be hurtfull; as from their local situation and circumstances it is impossible they should be ever truly and properly represented there. The inhabitants of this country in all probability in a few years will be more numerous, than those of Great Britain and Ireland together; yet it is absurdly expected [Volume 5, Page 397] by the promoters of the present measures, that these, with their posterity to all generations, should be easy while their property, shall be disposed of by a house of commons at THREE THOUSAND MILES DISTANT from them;

who cannot be supposed to have the least care or concern for their real interest: Who have not only "NO natural care for their interest", but must be in effect "BRIBED AGAINST IT"; as every burden they lay on the colonists is so much saved or gained to themselves. Hitherto many of the Colonists have been free from Quit Rents; but if the breath of a british house of commons can originate an act for taking away all our money, our lands will go next or be subject to rack rents from haughty and relentless landlords who will ride at ease, while we are trodden in the dirt. The Colonists have been branded with the odious names of traitors and rebels, only for complaining of their grievances; How long such treatment will, or ought to be born is submitted. "


What is it that dissolves governments that are suppose to defend our liberties? John Locke presents this scenario:


John Lock - Second Treatise on Civil Government - 1689:

"...#212. Besides this overturning from without, governments are dissolved from within:

First. When the legislative is altered
, ...When any one, or more, shall take upon them to make laws whom the people have not appointed so to do, they make laws without authority, which the people are not therefore bound to obey; by which means they come again to be out of subjection, and may constitute to themselves a new legislative, as they think best, being in full liberty to resist the force of those who, without authority, would impose anything upon them. Every one is at the disposure of his own will, when those who had, by the "delegation" of the society, the declaring of the public will, are excluded from it, and others usurp the place who have no such authority or delegation. "



See Thomas Jefferson in the Kentucky Resolutions 1798:
Read in Full:

"...2. " Resolved, That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress (the federal government) a power to punish:

a.)  treason,
b.)  counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States,
c.)  piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and
d.)  offenses against the law of nations,


and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,"

therefore the act of Congress, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, and intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," as also the act passed by them on the — day of June, 1798, intituled "An Act to punish frauds committed on the bank of the United States,"
(>>>> and ALL their OTHER ACTS which assume to CREATE, DEFINE, or PUNISH crimes, OTHER than THOSE so "ENUMERATED" in the Constitution,) >>> are "ALTOGETHER" "VOID", and of "NO FORCE";

and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains SOLELY and EXCLUSIVELY to the respective "STATES", each within its own territory..."

To guard against states giving away or taking your rights and prepared to defend your rights, states need to be:

1.) small to give Adequate Representation, and
2.) strong to oppose the corruption of Distant (Federal and International) Legislatures.



#213. This being usually brought about by such in the commonwealth, who misuse the power they have

#217. Fourthly, the delivery also of the people into the subjection of a foreign power, either by the prince (president/executive) or by the legislative, is certainly a change of the legislative, and so a dissolution of the government. For the end why people entered into society being to be preserved one entire, free, independent society to be governed by its OWN laws, this is lost whenever they are given up into the power of ANOTHER. "


APP NOTE: The United States are actually Sovereign Independent States, each with their own republic (Which even smaller independent republics can be created i.e. divided and formed into smaller independent states as provided under the Constitution to give adequate representation) - The Constitution does not take that away, as the Constitution is a very LIMITED "COMPACT" See Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788 and Virginia Resolutions 1798

Virginia Resolution of 1798

Read in Full:

James Madison:

That the General Assembly of Virginia, doth unequivocably express a firm resolution to maintain and defend the CONSTITUTION of the United States, AND the CONSTITUTION OF THIS STATE,
against every aggression either foreign or domestic, and that they will support "the government" of the United States in all measures "WARRANTED" by "the former".

That this assembly most solemnly declares a warm attachment to the Union of the "States", to maintain which it pledges all its powers; and that for this end, it is their duty to watch over and oppose every infraction of those principles which constitute the "only basis" of that Union, because a faithful observance of them, can alone secure it's existence and the public happiness.

That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties;
as limited by the "plain sense and intention" of the instrument constituting the "compact"; as NO further valid that they are authorized by the grants "ENUMERATED" in "THAT COMPACT"; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said COMPACT, the STATES who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in DUTY bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the "EVIL", and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.

That the General Assembly doth also express its DEEP REGRET, that a spirit has in sundry instances, been manifested by the federal government, to "enlarge its powers by FORCED constructions" of the constitutional charter which defines them;

and that implications have appeared of
a "design" to "EXPOUND" certain >>>"GENERAL "PHRASES" (which having been copied from the very limited grant of power, in the former articles of confederation were the less liable to be misconstrued) so as to destroy the meaning and effect, of the particular "ENUMERATION" which NECESSARILY EXPLAINS AND LIMITS THE GENERAL PHRASES;

so as to consolidate the states by degrees, into "ONE SOVEREIGNTY" (APP: i.e. "ONE NATION" - NO WHERE INTENDED by the Founders), the obvious tendency and INEVITABLE CONSEQUENCE of which would be,

>>>"TRANSFORM" the present "republican" "SYSTEM" (of which there are numerous "independent Republics") of the United State"s", into "an absolute", or "at best" a MIXED >>>"MONARCHY". ..."


(APP: a "Mixed Monarchy" is a ruling class which we can see emerging today with two Clintons and three Bush's attempting to monopolize the presidency and control of the United States - this was warned by George Mason in the Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788)



The above Founders documents show we are NOT "One Sovereignty" and we are NOT "One Nation";

his "One Nation" phrase was created by a SOCIALIST Francis Bellamy - See: in 1892;

SOCIALIST Francis Bellamy served as founding vice president and wrote several articles for the Society of Christian Socialists' newspaper, "the Dawn";

The Pledge of
Allegiance that was written by the SOCIALIST Francis Bellamy, See:

hen compared with the Founders
Original intent
as spoken by James Madison above in the Virginia Resolutions 1798 and in The Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788 show how far we have strayed from the true definition of free republics, liberty and freedom as defined in the Original Founding Documents and Original LIMITED Constitutional COMPACT.

ur states when they transfer undelegated powers to the federal government and federal governments, dissolve themselves when they attempt to make us "One Nation", OR when either of them attempt to transfer the authority given to them into the hands of the United Nations as clearly explained here by Locke.

A more accurate pledge would be one that would follow the written intent and principles of freedom and indicate the flag follows those principles, and one that would not lend itself to blind nationalism; or blindly following a image of a flag whose legislatures change the meaning of on a regular basis; or to any such blind national socialism;

This pledge
would be and we propose:

New Pledge
of Allegiance:

"I pledge allegiance to those Inalienable Rights respecting the Laws of Nature, which defines the Flag of the United States of America;

and to protecting our Free Common Law Societies in which they consent to form; Independent State Republics, United under God, with liberty and justice for all."

     Richard Taylor - American Patriot Party



#220. In these
, and the like cases, when the government is DISSOLVED, the people are at liberty to provide for themselves by erecting a new legislative differing from the other by the change of persons, or form, or both, as they shall find it most for their safety and good. For the society can never, by the fault of another, lose the native and original right it has to preserve itself, which can only be done by a settled legislative and a fair and impartial execution of the laws made by it. But the state of mankind is not so miserable that they are not capable of using this remedy till it be too late to look for any. To tell people they may provide for themselves by erecting a new legislative, when, by oppression, artifice, or being delivered over to a foreign power, their old one is gone, is only to tell them they may expect relief when it is too late, and the evil is past cure. This is, in effect, no more than to bid them first be slaves, and then to take care of their liberty, and, when their chains are on, tell them they may act like free men. This, if barely so, is rather mockery than relief, and men can never be secure from tyranny if there be no means to escape it till they are perfectly under it; and, therefore, it is that they have not only a right to get out of it, but to prevent it.

#221. There is, therefore, secondly, another way whereby governments are dissolved
, and that is, when the legislative, or the prince, either of them act contrary to their trust.

For the legislative acts against the trust reposed in them when they endeavour to invade the property of the subject, and to make themselves, or any part of the community, masters or arbitrary disposers of the lives, liberties, or fortunes of the people.

#222. The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their property;
and the end while they choose and authorise a legislative is that there may be laws made, and rules set, as guards and fences to the properties of all the society, to limit the power and moderate the dominion of every part and member of the society. For since it can never be supposed to be the will of the society that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which every one designs to secure by entering into society, and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making:
whenever the legislators endeavour to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence. Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition, fear, folly, or corruption, ...

(APP Note: See this in Samuel Adams Statement within the Rights of the Colonists, 1772:  "If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave.")

endeavour to grasp themselves, or PUT INTO THE HANDS OF "ANY OTHER", an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people, by this BREACH OF TRUST they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the people, who have a right to resume their original liberty, and by the establishment of a new legislative (such as they shall think fit), provide for their own safety and security, (APP Note: See this in the Declaration of Independence) which is the end for which they are in society. What I have said here concerning the legislative in general holds true also concerning the supreme executor, who having a double trust put in him, both to have a part in the legislative and the supreme execution of the law, acts against both, when he goes about to set up his own arbitrary will as the law of the society. He acts also contrary to his trust when he employs the force, treasure, and offices of the society to corrupt the representatives and gain them to his purposes, when he openly pre-engages the electors, and prescribes, to their choice, such whom he has, by solicitation, threats, promises, or otherwise, won to his "designs", and employs them to bring in such who have promised beforehand what to vote and what to enact. Thus to regulate candidates and electors, and new model the ways of election, what is it but to cut up the government by the roots, and poison the very fountain of public security? For the people having reserved to themselves the choice of their representatives as the fence to their properties, could do it for no other end but that they might always be freely chosen, and so chosen, freely act and advise as the necessity of the commonwealth and the public good should, upon examination and mature debate, be judged to require. This, those who give their votes before they hear the debate, and have weighed the reasons on all sides, are not capable of doing. To prepare such an assembly as this, and endeavour to set up the declared abettors of his own will, for the true representatives of the people, and the law-makers of the society, is certainly as great a breach of trust, and as perfect a declaration of a "design"..."

(APP Note: See this in the Declaration of Independence and compare 223-226:

" ... But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object,
evinces a "design" to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to THROW OFF such government  and to provide new guards for their future security.)

LOCKE CONTINUED: " subvert the government, as is possible to be met with. To which, if one shall add rewards and punishments visibly employed to the same end, and all the arts of perverted law made use of to take off and destroy all that stand in the way of such a >>"design", and will not comply and consent to betray the liberties of their country, it will be past doubt what is doing. What power they ought to have in the society who thus employ it contrary to the trust that along with it in its first institution, is easy to determine;
and one cannot but see that he who has once attempted any such thing as this cannot any longer be trusted."


CBC SPECIAL REPORT: Global Warming Doomsday Called Off:

Part 1 of 5:
Part 2 of 5:
Part 3 of 5:
Part 4 of 5:
Part 5 of 5:

The Great Global Warming Swindle:

John Locke - #201:

"It is a mistake to think this fault is proper only to monarchies. Other forms of government are liable to it as well as that;

WHEREVER the power that is put in any hands for the government of the people and the preservation of their properties is applied to "other ends",

made use of to "IMPOVERISH", "HARASS", or "SUBDUE" them to the ARBITRARY and IRREGULAR commands of those that have it,

THERE it presently becomes TYRANNY,

those that thus use it are one or many. Thus we read of the thirty tyrants at Athens, as well as one at Syracuse; and the intolerable dominion of the Decemviri at Rome was nothing better." ..."



2013 DEBT to CHINA:

"...Forbes based his comments on fiscal 2011, in which the CBO estimates the government will spend $225 billion, or $616,438,356 per day, on interest payments. China held 12.1 percent of public debt at the end of February. So if the 2011 estimates hold and China holds the same proportion of debt throughout the year, it would receive about

$74.4 million per day


Investments the Chinese make with this money compounds the danger TEN FOLD TIMES TEN.

Free trade is fine.

Handing our Country for free to the Chinese or reducing our defense by empowering a Communist Country to our eventual demise is NOT.

Presently, the interest owed on money borrowed from China and being paid to China, is financing a large percentage of the CHINESE MILITARY.

Interest to the debt owed to China By 2020, if not curtailed, can and will finance the ENTIRE CHINESE ANNUAL MILITARY BUDGET

As another example, in 2012 China published a defense budget of RMB 670.274 billion, with an increase from 2011 of RMB 67.604 billion and a growth rate of 11.2 percent. "

2013: "....Military spending is set to rise this year to 740.6 billion yuan ($119 billion) from 669.1 billion yuan, the Ministry of Finance said in a report. China has the second-biggest military budget in the world after the U.S., which spent nearly six times more on defense than China last year and is now cutting those outlays. ..."

We are presently financing and arming our potential futu
re enemies IN MASS.




Our Federal and State SO CALLED Representatives are financing through wasteful spending, lavish salary raises and retirements, forced taxation to pay for forced UNION "MAXIMUM" WAGES, WASTEFUL CORPORATE CONTRACTS, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND NEEDLESS UNENDING WARS and DEBT CREATED BY THESE to which the interest owed China is now the Arming of Chinese with Machine guns, Tanks, Cannons, Missiles, Jet fighters and Nuclear Arsenals;

ALL WHILE passing laws here to prohibit citizens from
from owning even a machine gun to defend ourselves, communities and countries.

How more stupid and ignorant can those "so called" "REPRESENTATIVES" "you" have elected be?

But it is a fact that these representatives are not "stupid and ignorant", but fully aware and calculating;

These Representatives, every one, are guilty of rendering aid to our enemies;

These representatives, every one, are guilty of the crimes of treason; Those who support or protect them in any fashion bear the same title - your duty to a "job" does not exceed your DUTY to uphold the Constitution or Essential Natural Rights which exceed even the Constitution as our Founders have established.

Neither retirement nor time can reduce these crimes these corrupted representatives have already committed.

            Are you ready to READ and LEARN?

ARE YOU READY TO VOTE FOR ("so called" by the Socialist Collectives Left and Socialist Corporates Collectives False Right )
"RADICAL" Constitutionalism the Founders readily PRESCRIBED YET? ...YES?    OR......Maybe you want to "wait" just a "little longer"?... and "hope" it gets "better"......


Then how ready are you to put the federal government back in it's
"10 MILE SQUARE BOX" intended for the federal government and all their "DEPARTMENTS" before they Enslave you to a point you cannot even defend yourself? Don't Know what  >>>> "BOX" I speak of?  ......... Are You Ready to Learn?    .......Lets see if you are....

Virgina Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788


which  >>>"CANNOT EXCEED" >>>"TEN MILES SQUARE", ( I.E. ......THE >>>>>>> "BOX"  )  and may >>>"NOT BE" more than "ONE" MILE, (Limit of Physical Structures) will involve the DANGERS which he (Patrick Henry) apprehends. ..."


Getting smarter? Want to learn more? Keep Reading and Read the Links provided as well.

Right now, even those that are being propped up as "Patriotic",
are setting you up for another fall. 

How? Because most of the Citizenry have never read what real freedom is; and they are using that ignorance to set you up.

"RAND" Paul and including such others as Matt Kibbe - Freedomworks, Mike Huckabee, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck,  Mark Levin and others; who are promoting a UNCONSTITUTIONAL "UN-ENUMERATED" FLAT SALES TAX or "FAIRTAX" that will "SHOE HORN" the federal governments control over the states and local communities;

Which is very foolish and IGNORANT.

See more on Taxes Below.
RAND Paul is also trying to establish and continue to empower "Undelegated federal powers of "certain crimes" 
to unconstitutionally regulate the states and local communities;

SUCH AS - EXCHANGING the regulating power practiced with Roe VS Wade with yet another UN-DELEGATED FEDERAL power over the states, "INSTEAD OF" simply removing the "unconstitutional Federal Power" that enforces Roe vs Wade and replace it with "NOTHING"; and then let the local communities regulate it

FACT: The Federal Government is
LIMITED to DEFINING OR PROSECUTING "ONLY FOUR" CRIMES in the Constitution Article 1 - Section 8; and in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS in the Kentucky Resolutions - Par.#2);  Any other power arrogates a unconstitutional power;

By placing the issues where they belong - WITH THE STATES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES - it  would resolve many of the "just issues" Rand wishes to accomplish;

Simply continuing to give issues to a federal court;  Giving to it authority to decide where it has absolutely NO Constitutional authority, is not the way. This simply allows the federal government to arrogate or continue to arrogate undelegated powers under a "PRETENSE OF AUTHORITY".