|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APP Opposition Groups:
Southern
Poverty Law Center - The
Center for Propaganda for
Socialism in America which
opposes CITIZEN MILITIAS
This is in Opposition of the
Constitution as it was written
and against the principles of
Common Law... A REVERSE HATE
GROUP -
LINK:
SPL #1
SPL #2
patriot-movement
SPL #3
intelligence-files
SPL #4
This
group say they want to
protect on one hand -
but then allow the deviant of
society to brain wash and then
misuse others or each other
outside the Laws of Nature;
Allowing for the existence of
Voluntary Slavery and
Slavery - Through the
relinquishment of inalienable
rights. This Group, Communist
/ Socialist in nature,
places a form of "Subjugated
Peace" under a central
national government;
Instead of abiding by the True
Principles of Freedom
established in small well
represented and independent
republics;
See John Locke with
regard to such a "peace" word search
LAMB on his Second Treatise
on Civil Government.
They are a proponent of
reverse hate; and are a
proponent for the use of
National Federal force,
accumulated by government
"laws" which have been
created without
authority - i.e. under
the PRETENSE OF
AUTHORITY.
See Virginia
Resolution, James Madison, denouncing when
the government makes itself,
and not the Constitution the
Measure of its powers.
States State Elections
Division, Secretary of State
Directory and State
Constitutions:
ALABAMA
Office of Secretary of
State
PO Box 5616
Montgomery, AL 36106
(334) 242-7559 FAX (334)
242-2444
http://www.sos.state.al.us
/election/index.cfm
Alabama Elections and Voting
http://www.alabama.gov/p
ortal/government/voting.js
p
Alabama Elections Division
http://www.alabamaintera
ctive.org/ http://www.sos.state.al.us
/election/index.cfm
Alabama State Constitution
http://www.legislature.stat
e.al.us/CodeOfAlabama/
Constitution/
ALASKA
Alaska Elections Division
and Voting:
http://www.state.ak.us/loc
al/akdir1.shtml
PO Box 110017
Juneau, AK 99811-0017
(907) 465-4611 FAX (907)
465-3203
Alaska State Government
Directory
http://www.state.ak.us
Alaska State Constitution
http://ltgov.state.ak.us/co
nstitution.php
AMERICAN SAMOA
Election Officer
PO Box 3790
Pago Pago AS 96799
011-684-633-2522 FAX
011-684-633-7116
http://www.electionoffice.
as
ARIZONA
Secretary of State's
Office
1700 W. Washington, 7th Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85007
(602) 542-8683 FAX (602)
542-6172
http://www.azsos.gov
Arizona Elections Division and
Voting
http://www.azsos.gov/elec tion
Arizona State Constitution
http://www.azleg.gov/Con
stitution.asp
ARKANSAS
Arkansas Secretary of
State
http://www.sos.arkansas.
gov
Secretary of State, State
Capitol, Room 026
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 682-3419 FAX (501)
682-3408
Arkansas Constitution
http://www.sos.arkansas.
gov/ar-constitution/arcons
t/arconst.htm
CALIFORNIA
California Secretary of
State
http://www.sos.arkansas.
gov/ar-constitution/arcons
t/arconst.htm
California State Elections
Division and Voting
http://www.ss.ca.gov/elect
ions/elections.htm
1500 11th St., 5th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 657-2166 FAX (916)
653-3214
California State Constitution
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/
const-toc.html
COLORADO
Colorado Secretary of
State
http://www.sos.state.co.u
s
Colorado State Elections
Division and Voting
http://www.elections.color
ado.gov
1700 Broadway, Suite 270
Denver, CO 80290
(303) 894-2680 FAX (303)
869-7731
Colorado State Constitution
http://www.colorado.gov/d
pa/doit/archives/constituti
on/index.html
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut Secretary of
State
http://www.sots.ct.gov
Connecticut State Elections
Division and Voting
http://www.sots.ct.gov/Ele
ctionsServices/ElectionIn
dex.html
30 Trinity Street
Hartford, CT 06106
(860) 509-6100 FAX (860)
509-6127
Connecticut State Constitution
http://www.sots.ct.gov/Re
gisterManual/SectionI/ctc
onstit.htm
DELAWARE
Delaware Secretary of
State
http://www.state.de.us/so
s
Delaware State Elections
Division
http://www.state.de.us/ele
ction
111 S. West Street,
Suite 10
Dover, DE 19904
(302) 739-4277 FAX (302) 739-
6794
Delaware Elections Directory
http://delaware.gov/egov/
portal.nsf
Delaware State Constitution
http://www.state.de.us/fac
ts/constit/de_const.htm
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -
WASHINGTON DC
District of Columbia
Secretary of State
http://www.os.dc.gov/os/si
te
District of Columbia Board of
Ethics and Elections
http://www.dcboee.org
441 Fourth St., NW, Suite 250N
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 727-2525 FAX (202)
347-2648
District of Columbia Home Rule
Act
http://www.abfa.com/ogc/
hract.htm
FLORIDA
Florida Department of
State
http://www.dos.state.fl.us
Florida State Elections
Division
http://election.dos.state.fl.
us/index.html
Room 316, R.A. Gray Building
500 S. Bronough Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250
(850) 245-6200 FAX (850)
245-6217
Florida State Constitution
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/
Statutes/index.cfm
GEORGIA
Georgia Secretary of State
http://www.georgia.gov
Georgia State Elections
Division
Suite 1104, West Tower
2 Martin Luther King, Jr.
Drive, SE
Atlanta, GA 30334-1505
(404) 656-2871 FAX (404)
651-9536
http://www.sos.state.ga.u
s/elections
Georgia State Constitution
http://www.sos.state.ga.u
s/ELECTIONS/constitutio
n.htm
GUAM
Guam Secretary of State
Governor of Guam
http://guamgovernor.net
Guam Election Commission
PO Box BG
Agana, GU 96910
(671) 477-9791 Fax: (671)
477-1895
http://www.guamelection.
org
Attorney General of Guam
The Organic Act of Guam
http://www.guamattorney
general.com
HAWAII
Office of Elections
802 Lehua Avenue
Pearl City, HI 96782
(808) 453-8683 FAX (808)
453-6006
http://www.state.hi.us/ele
ctions
IDAHO
Idaho Secretary of State
700 W. Jefferson, Rm. 203
Boise, ID 83720-0080
(208) 334-2300 FAX (208)
334-2282
http://www.idsos.state.id.
us/elect/eleindex.htm
ILLINOIS
State Board of Elections
1020 S. Spring St., PO Box
4187
Springfield, IL 62708
(217) 782-4141 FAX (217)
782-5959
http://www.elections.il.gov
INDIANA
Indiana Election Division
302 W. Washington, Rm E204
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 232-3939 FAX (317)
233-6793
http://www.in.gov/sos/elec
tions
IOWA
Iowa Secretary of State
Office
321 E. 12th Street
Des Moines, IA 50319
(515) 281-5823 FAX (515)
281-7142
http://www.sos.state.ia.us
KANSAS
Deputy Assistant for
Elections
120 SW 10th Ave.
First Floor, Memorial Hall
Topeka, Kansas 66612-1594
(785) 296-4561 FAX (785)
291-3051
http://www.kssos.org
KENTUCKY
State Board of Elections
140 Walnut St.,
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 573-7100 FAX (502)
573-4369
http://www.kysos.com/ind
ex/main/elecdiv.asp
LOUISIANA
Commissioner of Elections
8549 United Plaza Blvd.
P.O. Box 94125
Baton Rouge, LA 70802-9125
(225) 922-0900 FAX (225)
922-0945
http://www.sec.state.la.us
/elections/elections-index.
htm
MAINE
Secretary of State
101 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333-0101
(207) 624-7734 FAX (207)
287-5428
Elections Director
101 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333-0101
(207) 624-7734 FAX (207)
287-5428
http://www.maine.gov/sos
/cec/elec
MARYLAND
State Board of Elections
P.O. Box 6486
Annapolis, Maryland 21401-0486
(410) 269-2840 FAX (410)
974-2019
http://www.elections.state
.md.us
MASSACHUSETTS
Election Division
One Ashburton Place, Room 1705
Boston, MA 02108
(617) 727-2828 FAX (617)
742-3238
http://www.state.ma.us/se
c/ele/eleidx.htm
MICHIGAN
Bureau of Elections
Treasury Building, 1st Floor
430 W. Allegan Street
Lansing, MI 48918
(517) 373-2540 FAX (517)
241-2784
http://www.michigan.gov/s
os/0,1606,7-127-1633---,
00.html
MINNESOTA
Secretary of State
180 State Office Building
100 Rev. Martin Luther King
Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
(651) 215-1440 FAX (651)
296-9073
http://www.sos.state.mn.u
s/election/index.html
MISSISSIPPI
Secretary of State for
Elections
PO Box 136, 401 Mississippi
St.
Jackson, MS 39205
(601) 359-6368 FAX (601)
359-1499
http://www.sos.state.ms.u
s
MISSOURI
Missouri Secretary of
State's Office
PO Box 1767
Jefferson City, MO 65102
(573) 751-2301 FAX (573)
526-3242
http://www.sos.mo.gov/el
ections
MONTANA
Deputy for Elections
PO Box 202801
Helena, MT 59620
(406) 444-5376 FAX (406)
444-2023
http://sos.state.mt.us/css/i
ndex.asp
NEBRASKA
Secretary of State
State Capitol, Suite 2300
Lincoln, NE 68502
(402) 471-3229 FAX (402)
471-3237
http://www.nol.org/home/
SOS/Elections/election.ht
m
NEVADA
Nevada Secretary of State
101 North Carson St., Suite 3
Carson City, NV 89701
(775) 684-5793 FAX (775)
684-5718
http://sos.state.nv.us
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Secretary of State
State House, Room 204
Concord, NH 03301-4989
(603) 271-5335 FAX (603)
271-7933
http://www.sos.nh.gov/ele
ctionsnew.htm
NEW JERSEY
Division of Elections
Office of the Attorney General
44 South Clinton Avenue, 7th
Floor
P.O Box 304
Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0304
(609) 292-3760 FAX
(609)777-1280
http://www.njelections.org
NEW MEXICO
Director of Elections
State Capitol Annex
325 Don Gaspar, Suite 300
Santa Fe, NM 87503
(505) 827-3620 FAX (505)
827-8403
http://www.sos.state.nm.u
s/Main/Elections/ElectionI
nfo.htm
NEW YORK
State Board of Elections
40 Steuben Street
Albany, NY 12207
(518) 474-8100 (518) 486-4068
http://www.elections.state
.ny.us
NORTH CAROLINA
State Board of Elections
PO Box 27255
Raleigh, North Carolina
27611-7255
(919) 733-7173 FAX (919)
715-0135
http://www.sboe.state.nc.
us
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota Secretary of
State
600 E Boulevard Ave Dept 108
Bismarck, ND 58505-0500
(701) 328-3660 FAX (701)
328-2992
http://www.nd.gov/sos
OHIO
Ohio Secretary of State
Director of Elections
180 E. Broad St., 15th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
(614) 466-2585 FAX (614)
752-4360
http://www.sos.state.oh.u
s/sos/elections/index.html
OKLAHOMA
State Election Board
Room 6, State Capitol
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
(405) 521-2391 FAX (405)
521-6457
http://www.state.ok.us/~el
ections
OREGON
Director of Elections
Office of the Secretary of
State
141 State Capitol
Salem, OR 97310
(503) 986-1518 FAX (503)
373-7414
http://www.sos.state.or.us
/elections/elechp.htm
PENNSYLVANIA
Commissioner of Elections
210 North Office Building
Harrisburg, PA 17120
(717) 787-5280 FAX (717)
705-0721
http://www.dos.state.pa.u
s/bcel/site/default.asp
PUERTO RICO
Puerto Rico State Election
Commission
P.O. Box 195552
San Juan, PR 00919-5552
(787) 777-8675 FAX (787)
296-0173
http://www.ceepur.org
RHODE ISLAND
State Board of Elections
50 Branch Avenue
Providence, RI 02904
(401) 222-2345 FAX (401)
222-3135
http://www.elections.state
.ri.us
SOUTH CAROLINA
State Election Commission
Post Office Box 5987
Columbia, SC 29250
(803) 734-9060 FAX (803)
734-9366
http://www.state.sc.us/scs
ec
SOUTH DAKOTA
Election Supervisor
500 East Capitol Avenue
Pierre, SD 57501
(605) 773-3537 FAX (605)
773-6580
http://www.state.sd.us/so
s
TENNESSEE
Tennessee Secretary of
State's Office
312 Eighth Avenue North
9th Floor
Nashville, TN 37243
(615) 741-7956 FAX (615)
741-1278
http://www.state.tn.us/sos
/election.htm
TEXAS
Director of Elections, General
Law Division
Secretary of State/ Election
Division
Post Office Box 12060
Austin, TX 78711-2060
(512) 463-5650 FAX (512)
475-2811
http://www.sos.state.tx.us
/elections/index.shtml
UTAH
Utah State Elections
Office
Utah State Capitol Complex
East Office Building, Suite
E325
P.O. Box 142325
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-2325
(801) 538-1041 FAX (801)
538-1133
http://www.elections.utah.
gov
VERMONT
Director of Elections and
Campaign Finance
Office of Secretary of State
26 Terrace Street, Drawer 09
Montpelier, Vermont 05609-1101
(802) 828-2304 FAX (802)
828-5171
http://www.sec.state.vt.us
/#elections
VIRGIN ISLANDS
Supervisor of Elections
Election System of the Virgin
Islands
Post Office Box 1499,
Kingshill
St. Croix, VI 00851-1499
(340) 773-1021 FAX (340)
773-4523
http://www.vivote.gov
VIRGINIA
Secretary of State, Board
of Elections
200 North 9th Street, Room 101
Richmond, VA 23219
(800) 552-9745 or (804)
864-8901 FAX (804) 371-0194
http://www.sbe.state.va.u
s
WASHINGTON
Office of Secretary of
State, Elections Division
Legislative Building, P.O. Box
40220
Olympia, WA 98504-0220
(360) 902-4180 FAX (360)
586-5629
http://www.vote.wa.gov
WEST VIRGINIA
Manager of Elections
West Virginia Secretary of
State Elections Division
1900 Kanawha Blvd E.
State Capitol Room 157-K
Charleston, WV 25305-0770
(304) 558-6000 FAX (304)
558-0900
http://www.wvsos.com
WISCONSIN
Wisconsin State Elections
Board
17 West Main Street, Suite 310
Madison, WI 53703-3305
P.O. Box 2973
Madison, WI 53701-2973
(608) 266-8087 FAX (608)
267-0500
http://elections.state.wi.us
WYOMING
Wyoming Secretary of
State's Office
200 W. 24th Street
Cheyenne, WY 82002-0020
(307) 777-3573 FAX (307)
777-7640
http://soswy.state.wy.us/e
lection/election.htm
Federal Government Links:
Official US Department of
State
http://www.state.gov/
University of Chicago,
Founders Constitution
http://press-pubs.uchicag
o.edu/founders/
Constitution.Org
http://www.constitution.or
g
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George
Mason
6-16-1788: Who are
the MILITIA? They
consist NOW of the
"WHOLE PEOPLE"..."
See
quotes and
source link
regarding
MILITIAS at
bottom of this
page.
|
|
|
|
American
Patriot Party is now
posting on Facebook
with informative
videos and insight
to today's issues
and events.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-National-Headquarters/174074706883
Remember to share
our Facebook link,
our articles and
like before
returning! Help
spread the word.
Educate Yourself to
the Constitution as
it is correctly
defined by the
Founders in the
Ratifying
Conventions; Then
Educate Others!
TAXES
AN
IMPORTANT MESSAGE
FROM THE AMERICAN
PATRIOT PARTY ON
TAXATION:
DO
NOT BE TAKEN
IN BY NEW
TAX
SCHEMES -
SUCH AS THE
NATIONAL
FLAT TAX OR
FAIRTAX;
DO NOT LET OLD
TAX SCHEMES
SUCH AS THE INCOME
TAX REMAIN.
THE
INCOME TAX:
The INCOME TAX
is not
unconstitutional
because it was, or was
not, Ratified by
enough states (as
often surmised);
The INCOME TAX IS
"UNCONSTITUTIONAL"
"BECAUSE" IT IS A
EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED
"ARROGATION" OF POWER
- OUTSIDE THE LIMITED
DELEGATED POWERS
GRANTED.
THIS TYPE OF TAX
"CANNOT BE RATIFIED" BY THE
STATES TO AMEND THE
CONSTITUTION AND
ARROGATE A POWER "NO
WHERE
INTENDED" UPON THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
Changing the "LIMITED"
power of "ENUMERATED"
taxation which is
a DELEGATED POWER,
into a "UNLIMITED"
"UN-ENUMERATED" form
of taxation OUTSIDE
the DELEGATED POWER,
is an ARROGATION OF
POWER. It is a "NEW
POWER", EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.
READ WHERE THE
FOUNDERS SAY THIS: Virginia
Ratifying Convention
6-16-1788
PATRICK
HENRY (WARNS):
"...I
conjure you once
more to remember
the admonition of
that sage man who
told you that,
"when
you give power,
you
know not what
you give". I
know the
absolute
necessity of an
energetic
government.
But
is it
consistent
with any
principle of
prudence or
good policy to
grant
unlimited,
unbounded
authority,
which is so
totally
unnecessary
that gentlemen
say it will
"never be
exercised"? But
gentlemen say
that we must
make
experiments.
A wonderful
and unheard-of
experiment it
will be, to
give "unlimited
power
unnecessarily"! ..." "...The experience of the world teaches
me the
jeopardy of
giving
enormous
power. Strike this clause out of the form of the
government,
and how will
it stand?
Congress will
still have
power, by the sweeping (supremacy) clause
, to make laws within that {438} place and the
strongholds, independently of the local authority of the state. I ask you, if this clause
be struck out,
whether the sweeping clause
will
not enable
them to
protect
themselves
from insult. If you grant them these powers, you destroy "every
degree of
responsibility". They will fully screen them from justice, and
preclude the
possibility of
punishing
them. No
instance can
be given of
such a wanton
grasp of power
as an
exclusive
legislation
"in all cases
whatever"."
EDMUND PENDLETON:
"...I
understand that (Supremacy
- Sweeping) clause
as NOT
going a "SINGLE
STEP BEYOND" the "DELEGATED
powers"
(APP: i.e. THE
POWER IS LIMITED TO THE
DELEGATED POWERS
AND THESE CAN
NEVER BE CHANGED -
THIS
IS WHAT MAKES US
A REPUBLIC UNDER
A "ORIGINAL
COMPACT").
What
can it act upon? Some
power given by "THIS" Constitution. If
they should be about
to pass a law in
consequence of this
clause, they must
pursue some of the "DELEGATED
powers", but
can by "NO MEANS"
DEPART from them,
(N)OR "ARROGATE"
"ANY NEW" powers;
for the PLAIN
LANGUAGE of
the clause is, to
give them power to
pass laws in order
to give "effect"
to the "DELEGATED"
powers"."
GEORGE
NICHOLAS:
"...If I
understand it right,
NO
"NEW" power
can be exercised."
JAMES
MADISON:
"....The honorable
member (PATRICK
HENRY)
asks, Why ask
for this power, and if
the subsequent clause
be not fully
competent for
the same purpose. If
so, WHAT
NEW TERRORS
can arise from this particular
clause? It
is only a superfluity.
If that
"LATITUDE" of "CONSTRUCTION" which
he contends for were
to take place with
respect to the "sweeping
clause", there "WOULD" be room
for those HORRORS.
But it gives "NO"
supplementary power.
It only enables them
to execute the
"DELEGATED powers".
"IF" the "DELEGATION"
(SET
LIMITATIONS)
of their powers be "SAFE"
(UNCORRUPTED
FROM THEIR ORIGINAL
INTENT AND FORM), no
possible
inconvenience can
arise from this
clause. It is at
most "BUT"
explanatory...."
GEORGE
NICHOLAS:
The
gentleman last up (PATRICK
HENRY)
says that the power
of legislation
includes every
thing. A general
power of legislation
does. But this
is a "special power"
of legislation. Therefore,
it does "NOT
contain that
plenitude of power
which he imagines. They (The
Federal
Government,
Executive, Federal
Legislative and
Federal Supreme
Court)
"CANNOT
LEGISLATE" in "ANY
case" but those
"PARTICULARLY
ENUMERATED" (DELEGATED).
APP: The
Ratifying and
AMENDMENT PROCESSES
of the Constitution
were established to
make changes
"WITHIN" the
DELEGATED powers;
These processes were
to limit and correct
unnecessary power and only
WITHIN the DELEGATED
powers; These
processes were NEVER
MEANT to ARROGATE
"NEW" POWERS upon
the federal government at
the will of the
state or federal
representatives
outside of the
very
limited
DELEGATED
powers.
DANGER!
NATIONAL
"FLAT TAX"
AND
"FAIRTAX"
"DECEPTION"
A NATIONAL "FLAT
TAX" OR THE
"FAIRTAX" WILL
ENSLAVE YOU FURTHER;
ATTEMPTS ARE BEING
MADE TO DECEIVE YOU
BY NATIONAL
CORPORATE / UNION
MEDIA.
Mark Levin
and other talk show
hosts (including
RAND Paul - Flat
Tax)
are promoting the
FairTax and or
Flat Tax. DO NOT
BE FOOLED! Like
the Income Tax,
these are
UNENUMERATED tax
schemes.
Worse yet, these
tax schemes
invite the
federal
government
into your
state to
define "WHAT
IS AND WHAT IS
NOT A
BUSINESS"! Using
this
reasoning will
allow the FairTax
and Flat Tax to
invite and
"shoehorn" the
federal
government right
into your home
and computer;
This is
as everything,
including your
person and
labor, will be
considered "a
business";
opening
everyone and
everything to
be scrutinized
by the NEW JOINT Federal / State Hybrid
form of the
IRS Created by
the FAIRTAX
and FLAT TAX
Systems. The FairTax and Flat Tax systems are BUY,
SELL and TRADE
TAXES.
They further
do not get rid
of the IRS,
they simply
change the
name to a far
more dangerous
and invasive
bureaucracy.
They simply
insure that
the waste in
government
continue; Both
tax schemes
are
like the
income tax,
they use
jealousy to
sell you into
deeper
slavery.
The
people that
are promoting
these
unconstitutional
tax systems
are also
stating they
are for
obeying the
Constitution.
This is clear
deception.
Remember - RAND
PAUL IS
NOT RON
PAUL;
RON PAUL
as with other
true
Constitutionalists
understand the
limitation of
the
Constitution
and want
to get rid of
the IRS and
Income tax and
replace them
with NOTHING!
This
will change
everything to
the BETTER.
Mark
Levin, Sean Hannity,
Glenn Beck
(all promoting
the same
corporate
message), RAND
PAUL and other
republicans
and democrats,
as well as
special
interests such
as
FREEDOMWORKS,
all want to
maintain the
flow of FLAT
PERCENTAGE
UN-ENUMERATED
TAX
MONEY to the
federal
government by
simply
changing the FORM
of the IRS. (Even
though they
"preach"
differently).
The
FairTax
and Flat Tax
"Tax Schemes"
will CHANGE
NOTHING; But they will in fact
make things WORSE;
This is
because it
will give "more invasive power" to the federal government
and
"tighter grip" over your "local and state laws"!
You
will jump from
the frying pan
into the FIRE!
Every gain in other areas against
a tyrannical
government
will mean
"NOTHING"; ---
"UNLESS" the tyrannical grip upon the "purse strings" are "pried from
their
fingers"; and
the power is
returned to
the states and
local
communities so
that their CONSENT
must be
granted to an
"ENUMERATED"
TAX, "BEFORE"
it is directed
to be
collected - as
originally
established in
the
Constitution.
Anything less, will
allow the tyrannical
government to finance
and shield itself from
necessary change which
will return us to true
representative
government as the
Founders intended.
For
more,
read our
Opposition Issues
Page.
Let
these talk
show hosts and
representatives
know that this
is NOT THE
WAY!
BE
RELENTLESS!
YOU AND THEY -
ARE BEING SET
UP FOR A FALL!
-------
LET US
REVIEW THE
FACTS:
The Original
Constitution
was written to
safeguard
against such corruption
and abuse of
power. All
taxation had
to be ENUMERATED
BEFORE
CONSENSUALLY
being
collected, it
was also
derived from
imports,
collected
simply from
viewing the
finished
product; so
your business
affairs,
income and
papers
were private:
COMPARE:
-------
Original
Constitution:
Article
1 Section 9:
"No Capitation, or OTHER direct, Tax shall be laid,
"UNLESS" in
"Proportion to
the Census or
"ENUMERATION"
herein "BEFORE"
directed to be
taken. "
....This
allows you the time
and means to
grant your
"CONSENT" before
it is "taken".
-------
Amended
Constitution:
Amendment
XVI: "The
Congress shall have
power to lay and
collect taxes on
incomes, from whatever
source derived,
without
apportionment among
the several States,
and "WITHOUT
REGARD"
to any census of
"ENUMERATION"."
The
Federal Government
Takes your money FIRST
in a "FLAT"
PERCENT ...THEN
decides what THEY
are going to spend
it on "AFTER"
they
TAKE
IT.
......"WITHOUT
YOUR CONSENT".
-------
Can you SEE
THE NECESSITY
of ENUMERATED
TAXATION!!!
...The Founders did!!
SEE THE ARROGATED
POWER?!
SUCH "UN-ENUMERATED"
"FLAT PERCENTAGE" TAXATION
TAKEN
CONTROL OF FIRST,
WHERE CONSENT IS
NEAR IMPOSSIBLE
TO BE OF ANY
EFFECT, CAN
"NEVER" BE
"CONSTITUTIONAL";
AND "RATIFYING"
SUCH
TAXATION, CAN
NEVER BE MADE TO
"AMEND" THE
CONSTITUTION.
NO MATTER
HOW MANY STATES
"RATIFY IT"!.
NO
MATTER WHAT
YOU NAME IT.
-------
If the federal government
stayed within
their
delegated
powers,
funding the
necessary
expenditures
and paying the
national debt
and national
defense would
be easy.
Force the
federal
government
stay within
the limited DELEGATED
powers;
Force them
by not funding
them to be
wasteful,
manipulative
and
tyrannical;
Stop paying for
your own
enslavement
and
destruction.
Stop
allowing State
born Exclusive
Privileges; Get
Unions, Corporations
and Tax Supported
Special Interests out
of Government.
Remove ALL
Lobbyists from
Washington DC.
Limit them to your
states where they must
confront the local
citizens of the state
and not manipulate our
state representatives
in our national
government in places
far distant from the
citizens that are most
effected by any
legislation.
Reduce the size of
states so that
there is adequate
representation and not
the manipulative
government which
occurs from "Distant
Legislatures";
"NULLIFICATION"
is "the proper remedy"
when delegated powers
have been exceeded.
See
Thomas Jefferson
shows us this "BY
EXAMPLE"
Kentucky
Resolutions only a
page and a half -
CLICK AND READ
IT!
See also our Segment "Republics
and Representation".
-------
"REMOVE
THE INCOME TAX"
and REPLACE
IT WITH
"NOTHING" - "MAKE" THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT "OBEY
THE CONSTITUTION"
AS IT WAS "FIRST
WRITTEN"!
SAY "NO" TO ANY
NEW TAX SCHEME!
TAKING MONEY WITHOUT CONSENT IS OUTSIDE OF OUR LAWS; IT
IS TYRANNY,
THEFT AND
CRIME.
"NULLIFICATION"
"FORCES THE
FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT
OBEY YOUR
CONSENT" - USE
IT.
ENFORCE THE
RIGHT BY
ENGAGING THE
STATE AND
COUNTY LAWS
AND LOCAL
JUDICIAL /
POLICE FORCE.
-------
Declaration
of Independence
The 17th
Grievance
Defining TYRANNY
in Government:
17.)
For imposing taxes
on us "WITHOUT"
"OUR" "CONSENT";
------
Taking
money in a
FLAT PERCENT
FIRST,
by
ANY METHOD
(income,
sales etc.),
Then deciding
how "they"
(the
government)
will spend
your money
later, when
there is "LITTLE
or NO
MEANS to
say NO";
Can in "NO
MEANS" be
considered "consent".
------
Learn More on our
"APP
Opposition Issues
Page"!
Review
also The
Constitutional
"A" Tax!
Feel
Free to paste this
article everywhere
so long as it is
in it's complete
unchanged text
and links. Check
back as we
occasionally
update articles.
Spread
the Word! Educate
Others!
American
Patriot Party.CC
Join and Support!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the
American Patriot
Party.
Thank you for
Visiting!
We are presently
working on our New Web
site on a new server
block.
Click
Here to view our
Original Site if a
Link is not working -
Plus
you may want to
review our previous
front page "Special
Reports" yet to be
transferred!
Visit
Us on Facebook to
Watch Choice Videos
and Insight!
Some
links will still bring
you to our original
sight anyway.
We are working to update
page links to correct
this.
Thank you
for your patience.
Here
are some defining words
from the Founders:
Enjoy and Educate
Others!
Lessons
of our Founders:
LIMITS
ON FEDERAL
POWER
James Madison -
Author of the
Constitution -
Virginia
Resolution 1798:
"...That
this state having by
its Convention,
which ratified the
federal
Constitution,
expressly declared,
that "AMONG
OTHER ESSENTIAL
RIGHTS",
"the Liberty of
Conscience and of the
Press "CANNOT
BE CANCELED",
abridged,
restrained,
OR
MODIFIED by
"ANY
AUTHORITY"
of the "United
States" (federal
government),"
(APP:
This includes
Executive Orders
(which in itself is
unconstitutional),
Legislative or Supreme
Court)
"...and from its extreme anxiety to guard these
rights from
EVERY
possible attack
of "SOPHISTRY
or AMBITION", having with other states, recommended an
amendment for that
purpose, which
amendment was, in
due time, ANNEXED to
the Constitution; it
would mark a "REPROACHABLE"
inconsistency,
and "CRIMINAL
DEGENERACY",
if an indifference
were now shewn, to
the most palpable
violation of ONE
OF THE RIGHTS,
thus declared and
secured;
and to the
establishment of a
PRECEDENT (UNDER
A PRETENSE
OF AUTHORITY)
which may be FATAL
TO THE OTHER (RIGHTS)...."
----------------------
Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, June 12, 1823, The Complete Jefferson, p. 322.
"...On every question of "CONSTRUCTION", let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the DEBATES (i.e. THE RATIFYING CONVENTIONS), and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the "probable one" in which it was passed". "
---------------------
Virginia
"Ratifying
Convention"
6-16-1788 -
George
Nicholas:
"...Congress have
power to define and
punish: a.) piracies
and felonies committed
on the high seas, and
b.) offenses against
the laws of nations;
(c.) Treason & d.)
Counterfeit of Coin)
....but they (APP: the
federal government,
executive, legislature
or supreme court) CANNOT
DEFINE
or PRESCRIBE
the PUNISHMENT
of "ANY
OTHER CRIME
WHATEVER", WITHOUT
"VIOLATING the
CONSTITUTION"...."
--------------------
(Thomas
Jefferson Repeated
this CONSTITUTIONAL
LIMITATION in the Kentucky
Resolutions, 1798 -
Paragraph #2 -
Please Read it! :
2. "
Resolved, That the
Constitution of the
United States, having
"DELEGATED" to
Congress a power to
punish:
a.) treason,
b.)
counterfeiting the
securities and
current coin of the
United States,
c.) piracies,
and felonies
committed on the
high seas (only),
and
d.) offenses
against the law of
nations,
and >>>>
NO OTHER CRIMES
>>>"WHATSOEVER";
and it being true as
a general
principle,
and one of the
amendments to the
Constitution having
also declared, that
"the powers not
delegated to the
United States by the
Constitution, not
prohibited by it to
the States,
are
reserved
to the States
respectively,
or
to the people,"therefore the
act of Congress, passed
on the 14th day of July,
1798, and intituled "An
Act in addition to the
act intituled An Act for
the punishment of
certain crimes against
the United States," as
also the act passed by
them on the — day of
June, 1798, intituled
"An Act to punish frauds
committed on the bank of
the United States," (>>>>
and ALL their OTHER
ACTS which assume to
CREATE,
DEFINE,
or PUNISH
crimes,
OTHER than
THOSE so
"ENUMERATED" in
the Constitution,)
>>> are "ALTOGETHER"
"VOID",
and of "NO
FORCE";
and
that the power
to create,
define, and
punish
such OTHER
CRIMES is
RESERVED,
and, "OF RIGHT",
appertains
SOLELY and
EXCLUSIVELY
to the respective
"STATES",
each within its
own territory..."
------------------
Virginia
"Ratifying
Convention"
6-16-1788
- Mr.
PENDLETON.
"Mr. Chairman, this (SWEEPING
i.e. SUPREMACY)
clause DOES
"NOT" give Congress
power to impede the
operation of ANY
PART of the
Constitution, (N)or to
make "ANY
REGULATION" that (EVEN)"MAY" affect
the interests of the
citizens
of the >>>"UNION
AT LARGE"....
(APP: think
about that,....
then Note
that the federal
government has NO
AUTHORITY to
GOVERN POLICE of
ANY KIND, OUTSIDE
the Washington DC
- i.e. what the
Founders described
as the 10 MILES
SQUARE and can
make NO LAW that
EVEN MAY EFFECT
THE CITIZENS of
the UNION at LARGE
- Here he
continues...)
"....But
it gives them power
over the "LOCAL"
police of "THE
PLACE", so as to be
secured from any
interruption in their
proceedings.
Notwithstanding the
violent attack upon
it, I believe, sir,
this is
the "fair
CONSTRUCTION of the
(SWEEPING
i.e. SUPREMACY)
clause". It
gives them power of
exclusive legislation
in any case WITHIN
>>>"THAT
DISTRICT" (WASHINGTON,
DC).
What is the meaning
of this? What is it
opposed to? Is it opposed
to the general
powers of the
federal legislature,
or to those of the
state legislatures? I
understand it as
opposed to the
legislative power of
that state "WHERE" IT
SHALL "BE". What, then,
is
the power? "IT IS", that
Congress shall exclusively
legislate "THERE", in order to preserve
{440} serve the "POLICE"
OF "THE
PLACE"
and their "OWN" "PERSONAL"
independence, that
they may not be
overawed or insulted, and
of course to preserve
them in opposition to
any attempt by the
state WHERE IT
SHALL "BE" ,
this is
the FAIR
"CONSTRUCTION"...." (of
the SWEEPING
i.e. SUPREMACY
clause)
-------------------
FBI, CIA, ATF, ICE
etc. All are policing
OUTSIDE the 10 miles
Square of Washington,
DC;
and ALL
OUTSIDE FEDERAL LIMITS
OF AUTHORITY.
ALL UNDER
THE "PRETENSE"
OF
AUTHORITY.
Any attempt to
claim Authority by the
Federal Government,
which was NOT DELEGATED
in the "Original
Compact" is an
ARROGATION oif POWER
which is Expressly
Prohibited (See Virginia
Ratifying Convention
6-16-1788);
As Thomas
Jefferson presented in
the Kentucky
Resolutions, 1798:
#1:
"...this COMPACT
was "NOT"
made the exclusive
or final judge of
the extent of the
(federal)
powers delegated
to ITSELF
(federal government
-
i.e. The Federal Supreme
Court, Executive or
Legislative are NOT
the final judge); since
that would have made
"IT'S" (the
federal
government's) "DISCRETION",
and "NOT THE
CONSTITUTION", the
measure of its
powers; but that, as in
ALL OTHER CASES of
compact among powers
having no common
judge, each
party (STATE) has
an EQUAL
right to judge for
itself, as
well of infractions
as of the mode and
measure of redress.
-------------------
Not clear enough?
Virginia
Ratifying Convention
6-16-1788:
JAMES MADISON. (Author
of the Constitution)
"Mr. Chairman: ...I cannot
comprehend that
the (FEDERAL
LEGISLATURES,
EXECUTIVE, FEDERAL
SUPREME COURT, FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT)
"power
of LEGISLATING"
over a "SMALL
DISTRICT"
(Washington
, DC), which
>>>"CANNOT
EXCEED"
>>>TEN
MILES SQUARE,
and may >>>"NOT BE"
more than "ONE"
MILE,
will involve the dangers
which he (Patrick
Henry)
apprehends. ..."
Now do you
understand?
The federal
governments
"supremacy" powers
under the
"supremacy
(sweeping)
clause" was,
and still is,
limited to the "10
miles square"
of Washington DC.
The supreme law of
the "land"?
Clearly
by the
founders own
words
"LAND"
supremacy clause meant
ONLY WITHIN
The 10 MILES
SQUARE and
"WITHIN"
the DELEGATED
powers only.
As
established in
this day
Ratifying
Convention (click
link for full
Convention
text) DEPARTMENTS
were LIMITED
to the 10
MILES SQUARE; the
federal
government CANNOT
GOVERN POLICE
outside
the 10
miles square;
CANNOT
DEFINE OR
PROSECUTE BUT
FOUR
CRIMES:
1.)
Treason, 2.)
Piracy on the
High
Seas (only),
3.) Law of
Nations, 4.)
Counterfeit of
coin;
Can collect
TAXES under
the "WELFARE
CLAUSE" for ONLY
2 THINGS
- NATIONAL
DEBT and NATIONAL
DEFENSE .
Mr.
GEORGE MASON.
"Mr. Chairman,
gentlemen say
there is no
new power
given by this
clause. Is there any thing in this Constitution which
secures to the
states the
powers which
are said to be
retained?
Will powers
remain to the
states which
are not
expressly
guarded and
reserved? I
will suppose a
case.
Gentlemen may
call it an
impossible
case, and "suppose"
that Congress
will act with
wisdom and
integrity.
Among the
enumerated
powers,
Congress are
to lay and
collect taxes,
duties,
imposts, and
excises, and
to pay the
debts, and to
provide for
the general
welfare and
common
defence; and by that clause (so
often called
the sweeping
clause)
they are to
make all laws
necessary to
execute those
laws.
Now,
suppose
oppressions
{442} should
arise under
"this"
(US Federal)
government,
and any writer
should dare to
stand forth,
and expose to
the community
at large the
abuses of
"those"powers;
could not
Congress,
under the
"idea"
of
providing for
the"general
welfare",
and under
their "OWN"
"CONSTRUCTION",
say that
this was
destroying the"general
peace", encouraging sedition,
and "poisoning
the minds of
the people"?
And could they
not, in order
to provide
against this,
lay a
dangerous
restriction On
the press?
(APP:
Exactly what
happened 10
years after
the
Constitution
in the Alien
and Sedition
Acts by
the federal
Government and
stopped by the "Virginia and Kentucky
Resolutions";
Such similar
attacks
on on
the freedom of
speech
has
been recently
promoted by
today's
federal
representatives)
Might they not even
bring the trial of
this restriction
within the ten
miles square,when
there is no
prohibition against
it? Might they
not thus destroy the
trial by jury? Would
they not "extend"
their
implication?
It
appears to me that they
MAY and "WILL". And
shall the support of our
rights depend on the
bounty of men "whose
interest it may be to
oppress us"?
That
Congress should have
power to provide for the
general
welfare
(APP Note: Defense
against "Foreign"
aggression) of the
Union, I grant.
But
I wish a clause in the
Constitution, with
respect to ALL
powers which
are NOT granted,
that they are retained
by the states.
Otherwise, the power
of providing for
the "general welfare"
may be "perverted to
its destruction".
Many
gentlemen, whom I
respect, take
different sides of
this question. We
wish this amendment
to be introduced, to
remove our
apprehensions.There
was a clause in the
Confederation
reserving to the
states respectively
every power,
jurisdiction, and
right, not expressly
delegated to the
United States. This
clause has never
been complained of,
but approved by all
Why not, then, have
a similar clause in
this Constitution, in
which it is the more
indispensably
necessary than in
the Confederation,
because of the great
augmentation of
power vested in the
former? In my humble
apprehension, unless
there be some such
clear and finite
expression, this
clause now under
consideration will
go to any thing our
rulers may think
proper. Unless
there be some
express declaration
that every thing not
given is retained, it will
be carried to any
power Congress may
please.
It
was answered:
Mr.
GEORGE NICHOLAS,
in reply to the
gentlemen opposed to
the clause under
debate, went over
the same
grounds, and
developed the same
principles, which
Mr. Pendleton and
Mr. Madison had
done. The opposers
of the {443} clause,
which gave the power
of providing for the
general welfare,
supposed its dangers
to result from its
connection with, and
extension of, the
powers granted in
the other
clauses. He
endeavored to show
the committee that
it only empowered
Congress to
make such laws
as would be
necessary to enable
them to pay the
public debts
and provide
for the common
defence;
>that
this "GENERAL
WELFARE" was united,
"NOT"
to "the
general power of
legislation",
but to the >PARTICULAR
power> of laying
and collecting
taxes, imposts, and
excises,
for the
"PURPOSE"
of paying the DEBTS
and providing for
the "COMMON DEFENCE",
that
is, that they could
raise (APP:
ONLY)
AS "MUCH"
money as would pay the "DEBTS"
and provide for the "COMMON
DEFENCE",
in "CONSEQUENCE OF
THIS POWER".
The
clause which was
affectedly called
the sweeping
(SUPREMACY) clause contained "NO new
grant of power".
To
illustrate this
position, he
observed that, if it
had been added at
the end of every one
of the enumerated
powers, instead of
being inserted at
the end of all, it would
be obvious to any
one that it was
"NO" augmentation
of power. If, for
instance, at the end
of the clause
granting power to
lay and collect
taxes, it had been
added that they
should have power to
make necessary and
proper laws to lay
and collect taxes,
who could suspect it
to be an addition of
power?
As it
would grant "NO"
new power if
inserted at the end
of each clause, it could
not when subjoined to
the whole.
He then
proceeded thus: But,
says he, who is to
determine the extent
of such powers? I
say, the same power
which, in ALL
well-regulated
communities,
(COUNTY,
STATE, ANY ORGANIZED
COMMUNITIES
THAT ESTABLISH
CONSENT)
determines
the "extent" of
"legislative" powers.
If they exceed these
powers, the"JUDICIARY"
"WILL" (WHERE ARE
OUR LOCAL JUDGES!)
declare it
"VOID", or "ELSE"
"the PEOPLE" will
have a "RIGHT" to
declare it "VOID". Is
this depending on any
man? But, says the
gentleman, it may go
to any thing. It may
destroy the trial by
jury; and they may say
it is necessary for
providing for the
general defence. The
power of providing for
the general defence
only extends to raise
any sum of money they
may think necessary,
by taxes, imposts,
But, says he, our only
defence against
oppressive laws
consists in the virtue
of our
representatives. This
was
misrepresented.
If
I understand it right,
NO "NEW"
POWER can be EXERCISED.
As to those
which are actually
granted, we trust to the
fellow-feelings of our
representatives; and if
we are deceived, we
then "trust to
altering our {444}
government"."
Ask yourself.
Is our federal
government,
through
our federal so
called
representatives,
collecting
taxes under
the "welfare
clause" for
things
other
than the
national debt
and national
defense?
...
Getting
smarter?
PROPERTY
RIGHTS AND
LIMITATIONS OF
CONDEMNATION
Now
let us look at
the limited
power of
Condemnation
which
DEFINITION has
been so
corrupted by
state and
federal
governments.
The limited condemnation
clause was a war powers
act for "TEMPORARY"
temporary " taking", NOT
TO TAKE AND KEEP;
Nor an excuse for state
governments to take the
meaning to empower
themselves or the
federal government with
the misuse of the term.
Taking property without
CONSENT has never been,
nor will it ever be a
component of freedom or
of free government:
-------------------
TYRANNY
DEFINED BY JOHN
LOCKE'S 2ND TREATISE
ON CIVIL GOVERNMENT:
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/Locke_Civil_Government/locke_civil_government.html
JOHN
LOCKE: 140: "....for
if any one shall
claim a power to lay
and levy TAXES on
the people "by his
own authority", and
without such
"CONSENT of the
people", he thereby
"invades the
fundamental law of
PROPERTY", and
"subverts the end of
government".
>>>
For "what property
have I" in that
which another may
"by
right"
"take"
when he pleases
to himself?
JOHN
LOCKE: 141.
Fourthly.
The legislative
CANNOT transfer the
power of making laws
to ANY other hands,
for it being but a
delegated power from
the people, they who
have it CANNOT pass
it over to OTHERS.
JOHN
LOCKE: 149: And thus
the community perpetually
retains a supreme
power of saving
themselves from
the attempts and
designs of
"ANYBODY", even
of their
"LEGISLATORS", whenever
they shall be so
foolish or so wicked
as
to lay and carry on
"designs" against
the LIBERTIES AND
PROPERTIES of the
subject.
JOHN
LOCKE: 151:
"...But yet
it is to be observed
that though oaths of
allegiance and fealty
are taken to him (The
Executive),
it is NOT
to him as supreme
legislator, but as
supreme executor of
the law made by a
joint power of him
with others,
>>> allegiance
being nothing but
an obedience
according to law,
which, when he
VIOLATES, he
has "NO right to
obedience",
nor can claim it
otherwise than as the
public person vested
with the power of the
law, and so is to be
considered as the
image, phantom, or
representative of the
commonwealth, acted by
the will of the
society declared in
its laws, and thus he
has no will, no
power, but that of
the law. But
when he quits
this representation,
this public will,
and acts by his own
private will,
he DEGRADES
HIMSELF,
and is but a single
private person
WITHOUT POWER and
without will; the
members owing NO
OBEDIENCE but to
the public will of
the society
(i.e. LAW OF THE
CONSTITUTION).
JOHN
LOCKE: 155:
"It may
be demanded here, what
if the executive
power, being
possessed of the
force of the
commonwealth, shall
make use of that
force to
hinder the meeting and
acting of the
legislative, when the
original constitution
or the public
exigencies require it?
I
say, using force
upon the people,
without authority,
and CONTRARY TO
THE TRUST
(i.e. LIMITS SET
DOWN BY THE
CONSTITUTION) put
in him that does
so, >>>is
a "STATE OF WAR
WITH THE PEOPLE",
who have a right
to reinstate their
legislative in the
exercise of their
power. For having
erected a legislative
with an intent they
should exercise the
power of making laws,
either at certain set
times, or when there
is need of it, when
they are hindered by any
force from what is
so necessary to the
society, and
wherein the safety and
preservation of the
people consists, the
people have a
"RIGHT TO REMOVE
IT BY FORCE".
In all
states and
conditions the true
remedy of force
"WITHOUT AUTHORITY"
is to "OPPOSE FORCE
TO IT". The
use of force
"WITHOUT
AUTHORITY" always
puts him that uses
it into a "STATE
OF WAR" as the
AGGRESSOR, and
renders him liable
to be "TREATED
ACCORDINGLY"
JOHN
LOCKE: 201.
"It is a mistake
to think this
fault is proper
only to monarchies. Other
forms of
government are liable
to it as well as
that; for WHEREVER
the power that is put
in any hands for the
government of the
people and
the preservation
of their PROPERTIES
is applied to OTHER
ENDS, and made use
of to IMPOVERISH,
HARASS,
or to SUBDUE
THEM to the arbitrary
and irregular
commands of
those that have it, THERE
IT PRESENTLY
BECOMES TYRANNY,
..."
New:
On Facebook?
Follow us on
Facebook & Twitter!
National & NorthWest
Region:
Facebook (LIKE US! -
LIKE US ALOT! Pass /
Post our LINK and
Spread the word!):
http://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-National-Headquarters/174074706883
Follow us on
Twitter!
http://www.twitter.com/APPNational
http://www.twitter.com/AMPatriotParty
http://www.twitter.com/RichardTaylorAP
-----
Visit also our State /
County
Facebook and Twitter
Pages
Mountain States
Region
Wyoming
http://www.facebook.com/APPMountain
Southern California:
http://www.facebook.com/AmericanPatriotPartyOfSouthEasternCalifornia
South Eastern States
Region
More coming soon!
Thank
You for your
membership, support
and contributions!
RIGHT
OF CITIZENS TO
IMPORT, CONCEAL
& BEAR
MILITARY ARMS
RIGHT
OF CIVILIAN
POWER RATIO 25
to 1 OVER US
MILITARY
Here
is what you need
to know about your
NATURAL
AND CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT with
regard to "FIREARMS"
and CIVILIAN
"POWER":
President
George Washington
-
First Annual
Message to
Congress, January
8, 1790:
"...Among
the many interesting
objects which will
engage your attention,
that of providing for
the common defence
will merit
particular regard.
To be prepared for
war, is one of the
most effectual means
of preserving peace.
A
"free PEOPLE"
(ARMS
EVERYWHERE) ought
NOT ONLY
to be ARMED,
but disciplined; to
which end, a uniform
and well digested
plan is requisite:
and "their" safety
and interest "REQUIRE
that they
(the PEOPLE)
should promote
such
manufactories"
as tend to render
"them"
(THE "PEOPLE"
- ALL PEOPLE)
"INDEPENDENT"
of
OTHERS
(ALL OTHERS
- INCLUDING
and ESPECIALLY
GOVERNMENT - - -
See Next)
for "ESSENTIAL",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"PARTICULARLY"
for
>>>>>>>>>>>>"MILITARY"
"SUPPLIES"."
--------------------
President
George Washington
presented his mistrust
in the federal
government very
clearly and defined
the true intent where
the powers should lay,
and that is in the
hands of the CIVILIANS.
In
response to a
proposal for gun
registration:
George Washington in 1790
said:
"..."Absolutely
not. If the "PEOPLE
are armed" and the "federalists"
(FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT) "DO NOT
KNOW WHERE THE ARMS
ARE", there can NEVER
be an "oppressive
government."
--------------------
The RIGHT to CONCEAL from the
"STATE" AS WELL AS
"FEDERAL" government;
The purpose clearly
derived in George
Washington's
statement
to have the power to "PUT
DOWN BY USE OF ARMED
FORCE" an OPPRESSIVE
"FEDERAL" "OR STATE"
government.
-------------------
This is
clearly in line
with the 12th
Grievance of the
Declaration
of Independence. This
defines the Intent
of the 2nd
Amendment and the
INTENT
of the Founders.
12th
Grievance of the
Declaration of
Independence
(DEFINING TYRANNY):
"He (The
EXECUTIVE / KING)
has affected
to render the
military independent
of and SUPERIOR
to the CIVIL
(CIVILIAN)
"power"."
-------------------
Elbridge
Gerry, a
representative to
Congress from
Massachusetts during
the debates over the
Bill of Rights "What,
Sir, is the use of a
militia? It is to prevent
the establishment
of a standing
army, the bane
of liberty
... Whenever Governments
mean
to invade
the rights and
liberties of the
people,
they always
attempt to destroy
the militia,
in order to raise
an army upon
their ruins."
-------------------
Which
establishes a
division between
civilian MILITIA
powers and Standing
Military (ARMY),
as this is a important
establishment of those
reasons given by the
Founders.
-------------------
TRUE
DEFINITION OF
MILITIA
Let us
review other
words of James
Madison with
regards to militias and
standing armies; The
purpose and the POWER RATIO between them:
FEDERALIST
#46 (Quote
Paraphrase
- see actual
text bellow):
James
Madison Author
of the Constitution
and the Bill of
Rights:
"The HIGHEST NUMBER to which a
"standing army" can
be carried in "ANY
COUNTRY"
does NOT EXCEED one
hundredth (1/100th) part of the
souls, or one
twenty-fifth (1/25th) part of
the number ABLE to bear
arms.
This portion would not
yield, in the
United States, an
(STANDING ARMY) army
of more than
twenty-five or
thirty thousand men.
To "THESE"
would be
"OPPOSED" (APP:
indicating that the
"militia" is to be a
"OPPOSING force"
to the standing
army as well
as that of foreign
enemies)
a (CITIZEN)
MILITIA amounting to
near half a million
"CITIZENS"
with ARMS in their
"HANDS", "officered
by men chosen from
"AMONG THEMSELVES", (NOT
by government or the
standing army - This
definition is a
determiner of a TRUE
MILITIA) fighting
for "THEIR" (the
CITIZEN / militia's) common
liberties and united
and conducted
by government"S" possessing
THEIR
(the
CITIZEN / militia's) affections
and confidence.
It may well be doubted
whether a militia thus
circumstanced could ever
be conquered by such a "proportion" (ratio
in force) of
regular troops (i.e.
standing army). Besides
the advantage of being
armed, it
forms a barrier
against the "enterprises
of ambition" (Foreign
Interests,
Corporations, Banks), more
insurmountable than
any which a simple
government of any form
can admit of.
The governments of
Europe are afraid
to trust the
people with arms.
If they did, the
people would surely
shake off the yoke of
tyranny, as
America did.
Let us not
insult the free
and gallant citizens
of America with the suspicion
that they would be
less able to defend
the rights of which
they would be in
actual possession than
the debased
subjects of arbitrary power
would be to rescue
theirs from the hands
of their oppressors."
-----------
APP: The Actual Quote text
below should arouse
citizens greatest
fears and prompt a
call of alarm;
Though the words
James Madison
speaks, shows that he
establishes the
correct fact of
the powers of the
citizen militia
and limitations of
the standing army,
James Madison
lacked
the understanding,
which
Patrick Henry in
the Virginia
Ratifying Convention
6-16-1788
(which see)
clearly possessed
with regard to
power and
corruption;
The
present danger
correlating with what
James Madison said
could never happen - which
in fact "has"
happened,
establishes an urgency
that the counties and
states whose representatives
whom have not yet
been corrupted or have
not arrived at their
present position in
complete ignorance of
their
rights, duties
and
responsibilities,
should now move to
arm
the citizens of
all
ages able to
bear arms, to a
20 to 1
superior
force to the
standing army;
Those
in the standing
army,
understanding
their duty to
the
Constitution,
should begin to
relinquish their superiority
and begin to
transfer any
and all their
arms within
the United
States, not
necessary to repel
foreign
invasion, to
the Citizens
and most
local communities
so that the
balance of
power be
resumed; So
to
prevent
themselves,
and their
families as
well, from
being enslaved;
And
to prepare
with local
CITIZEN
MILITIAS, who
are even more
so
responsible in
their Duty as
free Citizens
to increase
their powers,
to repel a
move by
foreign,
national and
international
manipulators
of power to infiltrate
and control
the standing
army against
the
foundations
established in
the Original
Constitutions
and Common Law
Principles
of
freedom.
The
fears James
Madison
disregards,
in his
optimism of
the sure
limitations
instituted by
"delegated"
powers set
in the "ORIGINAL
CONSTITUTION"
which were
never to be
exceeded, have
become in fact
a reality
of today.
Review
the actual Quote from
Federalist #46
below, then
prepare.
Each man is
responsible for
his own freedom:
-----------
Federalist
#46: James
Madison -
Complete Quote
Text (
http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa46.htm
):
James Madison: "...The
only refuge left
for those
who prophesy the
downfall of the
State
governments is
the visionary
supposition that
the federal
government may
previously
accumulate a
military force for
the projects of
ambition.
The reasonings
contained in these
papers must have
been employed to
little purpose
indeed, if it could
be necessary now to
disprove
the reality of
this danger.
That the people and
the States should,
for a sufficient
period of time, elect
an
uninterrupted
succession of
men ready to
betray both;
that THE
"TRAITORS"
should,
throughout this
period,
uniformly and
systematically
pursue some
fixed plan for
the extension of
the military
establishment;
that
the governments and
the people of the States
should silently
and patiently
behold the
gathering
storm, and "
continue to
supply the
materials",
"until it
should be
prepared to
burst on their
own heads",
must appear to
every one more
like the
incoherent
dreams of a
delirious
jealousy, or
the misjudged
exaggerations
of a
counterfeit
zeal, than
like the sober
apprehensions
of genuine
patriotism.
Extravagant as the
supposition is, let
it however be made.
Let a regular army,
fully equal to the
resources of the
country, be formed;
and let it be
entirely at the
devotion of the
federal government;
still it would not
be going too far to
say, that the State
governments,
with the people
on their side,
would be able to
repel the danger.
The highest
number to
which,
according to
the best
computation, a
standing army
can be carried
in any
country, does
not exceed one
hundredth part
of the whole
number of
souls; or one
twenty-fifth
part of the
number able to
bear arms.
This
proportion
would not
yield, in the
United States,
an army of
more than
twenty-five or
thirty
thousand men.
"TO THESE" (The United States Military) WOULD BE
"OPPOSED" A
(CITIZEN)
"MILITIA"
amounting to
near half a
million of
"CITIZENS"
with "ARMS IN
THEIR HANDS",
OFFICERED BY
MEN CHOSEN
FROM "AMONG
THEMSELVES"
(CHOSEN BY THE LOCAL CITIZEN'S - NOT MILITARY OR FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT),
fighting for
their
(THE
CITIZEN'S) common
liberties, and
united and
conducted by
governments
possessing
their
(THE CITIZEN
MILITIA'S) affections
and
confidence.
It
may well be
doubted,
whether a
(CITIZEN) MILITIA
"thus
circumstanced"
(25 to 1
ARMED POWER
RATIO) could
ever be
conquered by
such a (SMALL) proportion of "regular
troops" (i.e. federal US ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINES).
Those who are
best acquainted
with the last
successful
resistance of this
country against
the British arms,
will be most
inclined to deny the possibility of it.
Besides the
advantage of
(THE CITIZENS) being armed, which the Americans
(CITIZENS) possess
over the
people of
almost every
other nation,
the existence
of
"subordinate
governments",
to which the
people are
attached, and
by which the (CITIZEN) MILITIA
officers are
appointed (officered by men chosen among themselves),
forms a
barrier
against the
"enterprises
of ambition",
more
insurmountable
than any which
a simple
government of
any form can
admit of.
Notwithstanding the
military
establishments in
the several kingdoms
of Europe,
which are carried as
far as the public
resources will bear, the
governments
are afraid to
trust the
people with
arms.
And it is not
certain, that
with this aid
alone they would
not be able to
shake off their
yokes.
But were the
people to
"possess" the
additional
advantages of
"LOCAL"
governments
chosen by
themselves,
who could
collect the
national will
and direct the
national
force, and of
officers
appointed out
of the (CIVILIAN) militia,
by these (LOCAL)
governments, and attached both to them and to the (CITIZEN) MILITIA,
it may be
"affirmed with
the greatest
assurance",
that the
throne of
"every tyranny
in Europe"
would be
"speedily
overturned" in
spite of the
legions which
surround it.
Let us not
insult the
free and
gallant
citizens of
America with
the suspicion,
that they
would be less
able to defend
the rights of
which they
would be in
"ACTUAL
POSSESSION",
than the
"debased
subjects of
arbitrary
power" would
be to rescue
theirs from
the hands of
their
oppressors.
Let us rather no
longer insult
them
with the supposition
that they can ever
reduce themselves to
the necessity of
making the
experiment, by a
blind and tame
submission to the "long
train of
insidious
measures which
must precede
and produce
it"."
APP: This should
alarm any US
Citizen, as our
present condition of
Citizens NOT armed
with a 25 to 1
superiority over our
own standing army;
and the fact that
our "Citizen
Militias" officered
by men "chosen among
themselves" do
NOT exist in any
number near this in
military capability
or armament, is
CLEAR EVIDENCE that
the "long train of insidious
measures which
must precede
and produce it" have "ALREADY OCCURRED".
CITIZEN
MILITIA
WHO ARE
THE MILITIA?
Virginia
Ratifying Convention
6-16-1788
Mr. GEORGE MASON. "Mr.
Chairman, a worthy
member has asked who
are the militia, if
they be not THE
PEOPLE of
this country, and if
we are not to be
protected from the
fate of the Germans,
Prussians, by
"OUR"
representation?
I ask, "Who are the
MILITIA"? They
consist NOW of the "WHOLE
PEOPLE" (of
each LOCAL COMMUNITY
OR STATE), except a few
public officers. But I
cannot say who will be
the militia of the
future day. If "that
paper" (THE
LIMITED
CONSTITUTIONAL
COMPACT BEING
CONSIDERED)
on the table gets "no
alteration", the
militia of the future
day may not
consist of all
classes, high and low,
and {426} rich and
poor; but they may be
"confined
to the lower and
middle classes of
the people",
granting "exclusion
to the higher
classes" of
the people.
If we should
ever see that day,
the most ignominious
punishments and heavy
fines (APP:
i.e.
jail and imprisonment
for simply being
armed - or being
armed with
equal
ARMS
with the
standing federal
US MILITARY)
may be
expected. Under the
present government,
all ranks of people
are subject to militia
duty. Under such a full
and equal
representation
as ours, there can be
no ignominious
punishment
inflicted.
But under this national,
or rather
consolidated
government, the
case will be
different. The
representation being "so
small and inadequate",
they
will have no
"FELLOW-FEELING" for
the people. They may
discriminate people in
their own predicament,
and exempt from duty
all the officers and LOWEST
CREATURES OF THE
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT.
..."
---------
Mr.
JOHN MARSHALL
" asked if
gentlemen were
serious
when they asserted
that, if the state
governments
had power to
interfere with the
militia, it
was by
implication.
If they were, he
asked the
committee whether
the
"least
attention" would
not show
that they were
"MISTAKEN".
The state
governments "DID
NOT" derive
their powers from
the general
(federal)
government; but EACH
(STATE
& LOCAL
COUNTY)
government
derived its
powers from the
PEOPLE, and
each was to
act according
to the powers given
it. Would
any gentleman
deny this? He
demanded if
powers not
given were
retained by
implication.
Could any man
say so? Could
any man say
that this
power was not
RETAINED by
the states,
as they had NOT
given it away?
For, says he,
does not a power
remain till it
is given away? The
state legislatures
had power to
command and govern
their militia
before, and have
it still,
undeniably, unless
there be something
in this
Constitution that
takes
it away.
For
Continental
purposes
Congress may call
forth the militia,
as to suppress
insurrections and
repel invasions.
But
the power given to
the states by the
people is "NOT
taken away"; for
the Constitution
does NOT say
so. In
the Confederation
Congress had this
power; but
the state
legislatures had it
"also".
The power of
legislating given
them within the "ten
miles square"
is exclusive
of the states,
because it is
"expressed to be
exclusive".
The truth is, that
when power is given
to the general
legislature, if it
was in the state
legislature before,
both shall exercise
it; unless there be
an incompatibility
in the exercise by
one to that by the
other, or negative
words precluding the
state governments
from it. But
there are NO
negative words
here. It
rests, therefore,
with
the "STATES".
To
me it appears, then,
unquestionable
that the state
governments
can call forth the
(CITIZEN)
militia, in case the
Constitution should
be adopted, in the "SAME
MANNER" as
they could have done
before
its adoption.
Gentlemen
have said that the
states cannot
defend themselves
without an "application
to Congress",
because "Congress"
can interpose!
>>>>Does
not every man feel
a "REFUTATION" of
the "argument" in
his own breast?
(i.e. CONGRESS CANNOT
INTERPOSE)
I WILL SHOW
{420} that
there could NOT
be a
combination, between
those who formed the
Constitution, to
take away this
power.
All
the restraints intended
to be laid on the
state governments
(besides where an
exclusive power is
expressly given to
Congress) are
contained in the
10th section of the
1st article. This
power is NOT
included in
the restrictions in
that section. But
what excludes every
possibility of
doubt, is the last
part of it that "no
state shall engage
in war, unless
actually invaded, or
in such imminent
danger as will not
admit of delay." When
invaded, they
(the States and
People) "CAN"
engage in war,
as also
when in "imminent
danger". This
clearly
proves
that the states can
use the militia when
they find it
NECESSARY."
"...But
the worthy
member
(Patrick
Henry)
fears, that in
one part of the
Union they will
be regulated and
disciplined, and
in another
neglected. This
danger is
enhanced by
leaving this
power to each
state; for some
states may
attend to their
militia, and
others may
neglect them.
If
Congress neglect
our (CITIZEN)
militia
(i.e.
"CITIZENS"),
"WE" (the States and People) "CAN ARM
THEM" "OURSELVES".
>>> CANNOT
Virginia "import
arms?
>>>Cannot
she put them
into the hands
of "HER"
militia-men?
(APP: i.e. THE
CITIZENS OF THE
INDEPENDENT
STATE "CAN"
import arms; and
as clearly
established
above, "without
ANY
application to
Congress /
federal
government")
(APP: So much
for the "MYTH"
that the Federal
government can
"interpose or
prevent"
military arms
from being
imported across
state lines, by
(mis)using
the
Commerce Clause)
He
then concluded
by observing,
that the power of
governing the
militia was NOT
vested in the
states by
implication,
because, being
"possessed of
it"
> "antecedent
to the adoption
of the
government,
and "not being
divested of it"
by any grant or
restriction in the
Constitution, they
must necessarily
be as "FULLY
possessed of it
as ever they had
been. >And
it could NOT be
said that the
states derived
ANY powers from
that (the
federal
government or
Constitution)
system, "but
RETAINED them,
"
>>>>>>>>"though not acknowledged in ANY PART
OF IT"."
That
which is not given, is
reserved
by the people.
Read the Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788 in FULL
GET EDUCATED!
EDUCATE OTHERS:
READ THE DOCUMENTS
AND PAPERS!
Do you have the means
to Donate? Remember:
Don't
put all your eggs in
one basket
such as the NRA; Donate
to several patriotic
and gun groups when
you donate and divide
the money equally;
This keeps those that
want to incrementally
control, manipulate or
sell out your rights
by controlling the
purse strings of just
a few major groups
from doing so; Make it
impossible for them to
try. By giving
to several smaller
groups it will empower
more passionate
Patriotic groups and
helps secure your
rights. Stay away from
Corporations or Non
Profits, they
are usually
compromised. A few
dollars here and a few
dollars there given to
smaller groups by all
those that are already
donating to large
groups will give the
smaller patriotic
groups the ability to
work. Spread the
wealth
and empower
freedom; Then watch
the freedom and
Liberty movement grow
strong. We
are just one,
make a list and donate
to others as well.
Thank
You for your
membership, support
and contributions!
SUPPORT YOUR NATURAL
RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS AND
SELF
PRESERVATION!
i.e. THE
FIRST LAW OF
NATURE AND
RESERVED NATURAL
RIGHT:
Samuel
Adams - Absolute
Rights of the
Colonists 1772:
1st. Natural
Rights of the
Colonists as
Men.--
"Among the
Natural Rights of
the Colonists are
these First. a
Right to Life;
Secondly to
Liberty; thirdly
to Property;
together with
the Right to
support and
defend them in
the "BEST MANNER THEY CAN"--Those
are evident
Branches
of,
rather than
deductions from
the "DUTY"
of Self
Preservation,
commonly
called "THE
FIRST LAW OF
NATURE"--"...
HUNDREDS OF SHERIFFS
STEP FORWARD "NO GUN
CONTROL IN OUR
COUNTY!"
They understand that it is the
Federal Government
that is LIMITED to the
DELEGATED powers of
the ORIGINAL
CONSTITUTIONAL COMPACT
that created the
AUTHORITY to begin
with. Much respect to
THESE MEN who
understand that we are
REPUBLIC "S" based
upon CERTAIN LAWS (A
COMPACT) and RESERVED
NATURAL RIGHTS. Not a
Total Democracy that
can vote away our
freedoms.
In Wyoming: Jail Time
proposed for for
Feds! - Hundreds
of Sheriffs tell the
Feds "NO GUN CONTROL
IN OUR COUNTIES" and
to OBEY THE
CONSTITUTION!
DESPITE BITTER
COLD IN MANY STATES,
THE FEBRUARY 8th
FIREARMS EVENT AS WITH
THE EARLIER APPRECIATE
FIREARMS DAY &
GUNS ACROSS AMERICA EVENT
WAS A BIG SUCCESS!!!
THOUSANDS CONTINUE TO
ATTEND EVENTS AND MANY
MORE ARE PLANNED THIS
YEAR!
PERIODICALLY CHECK FOR
EVENTS on our FACEBOOK
PAGE....
Find
these articles and
other news events on
our American
Patriot Party
Facebook Page:
Say No to
National
ID!
Sign
the Petition NOW!
(Then come back - of
course!)
Visit Us on FACEBOOK
to watch Choice
Videos! and Read
More
APP Articles!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US
Military Armed Forces
Base Directory:
Army Major Commands,
Army Major
Commands
AMC U.S. Army Material
Command located in Fort
Belvior, VA. The
official web site is
www.amc.army.mil
AMC is the Army's
premier provider of
materiel readiness to
the total force across
the spectrum of joint
military
operations. If a
soldier shoots it,
drives it, flies it,
wears it or eats it, AMC
provides it.
MTMC U.S. Army
Military Traffic
Management Command
located on Alexandria,
VA. The official
website is
www.mtmc.army.mil
MTMC is the Department
of Defense's
heavy-equipment mover
for contingency,
training and
humanitarian operations.
MEDCOM U.S. Army
Medical Command located
at Fort Sam Houston,
Texas. The
official website is
www.armymedicine.army.mil
MEDCOM projects and
sustains a healthy and
medically protected
force; trains, equips,
and deploys the medical
force; and manages and
promotes the health of
soldiers and military
families.
USARPAC U.S. Army
Pacific located at Fort
Shafter, Hawaii.
The official website is
www.usarpac.army.mil
USARPAC provides trained
and ready forces in
support of military and
peacetime operations in
the Asia-Pacific area in
order to contribute to
regional stability,
crisis response and
decisive victory.
FORSCOM U.S. Army
Forces Command located
at Fort McPherson,
Georgia. The
official website is
www.forscom.army.mil
The Army component of
U.S. Joint Forces
Command, FORSCOM trains,
mobilizes, deploys and
sustains active and
reserve component forces
capable of operating in
joint and combined
environments to meet
worldwide operational
commitments.
USASOC U.S. Army
Special Operations
Command located at Fort
Bragg, North
Carolina. The
official website is
www.soc.mil USASOC
organizes, trains,
educates, mans, equips,
funds, administers,
mobilizes, deploys and
sustains Army special
operations forces to
successfully conduct
worldwide special
operations across the
range of military
operations, in support
of regional combatant
commanders, American
ambassadors and other
agencies, as directed.
USARSO U.S. Army,
South located at Fort
Buchanan, Puerto
Rico. The official
website is
www.usarso.army.mil
USARSO commands and
controls Army forces in
the U.S. Southern
Command area of
responsibility and
provides theater support
for Army forces and
headquarters as directed
by the USSSOUTHCOM
commander in
chief. USARSO will
become a major
subordinate command of
FORSCOM and move to Fort
Sam Houston, Texas,
during fiscal year 2003.
TRADOC U.S. Army
Training and Doctrine
Command located at Fort
Monroe, Virginia.
The official website is
www.tradoc.army.mil
TRADOC shapes the
21st-century Army by
training and educating
its soldiers and leaders
while sustaining the
shared vision of how the
Army operates as a
member of joint service,
combined arms and
multinational teams.
CID U.S. Army Criminal
Investigation Command
located at Fort Belvoir,
Virginia. The
official website is
www.cid.army.mil
CID is the Army's
criminal investigative
organization and
conducts investigations
in which the Army is or
may be a party of
interest. CID
provides senior leader
protective-services and
forensic laboratory
support to
investigations;
maintains the Army's
criminal records;
provides logistical
security from factory to
foxhole; conducts
computer network
intrusion
investigations; and
develops countermeasures
to criminal and
subversive activity.
INSCOM U.S. Army
Intelligence and
Security Command located
at Fort Belvoir,
Virginia. The
official website is
www.inscom.army.mil
INSCOM conducts dominant
intelligence, security
and information
operations for
commanders and national
decision-makers, and
provides warfighters
with the seamless
intelligence needed to
understand and dominate
the battlefield.
SMDC U.S. Space and
Missile Defense Command
located in Arlington,
Virginia. The
official website is
www.smdc.army.mil
SDMC develops and
provides space and
missile-defense
capabilities for the
Army and the nation.
EUSA Eight U.S. Army
located in Yongsan,
Korea. The
official website is
http://8tharmy.korea.army.mil
EUSA supports deterrence
of North Korean
aggression against the
Republic of Korea and,
should deterrence fail,
supports
noncombatant-evacuation
operations and
transitions to
hostilities as it
generates combat power
to support the United
Nations Command and
Combined Forces Command
response.
USAREUR U.S. Army,
Europe located at
Heidelberg,
Germany. The
official website is
www.hqusareur.army.mil
As America's Army in
Europe, USAREUR is
structured and trained
as a versatile and agile
power-projection force,
ready for joint and
multinational
operations, and
committed to providing
for the readiness and
well being of its
soldiers, civilians and
families.
USASCE U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers located in
Washington, D.C.
The official website is
www.usace.army.mil
USACE provides quality,
responsive engineering
services to the Army,
Department of Defense
and the nation.
MDW U.S. Army Military
District of Washington
located at Fort McNair,
Washington, D.C.
The official website is
www.mdw.army.mil
MDW responds to crisis,
disaster or security
requirements in the
National Capital Region;
provides base operations
support for defense
organizations throughout
the NCR, including
operation of Arlington
National Cemetery; and
conducts official
ceremonies on behalf of
the nation's civilian
and military
leaders.
Provided by
MilitaryDial.Com - home
of Discount Long
Distance, Cellular
Accessories, Printer Ink
and Satellite TV for
Military Members.
AMC, MTMC, MEDCOM,
USARPAC, FORSCOM,
USASOC, USARSO, TRADOC,
CID, INSCOM, SMDC, EUSA,
USAREUR, USASCE, MDW
information page
Back to U.S. Army Index
Page
Pacific Command (PACOM)
Current Order of Battle:
Pacific Command
- U.S. Army
Pacific 8th U.S.
Army
- 25th Infantry
Division
(Light) -
6th Cavalry Brigade
- U.S. Army
Japan - 17th
Aviation Brigade
- U.S. Army
Alaska -
164th ATS Group
- 18th Medical
Command
- 19th Theater
Support Command
- 2nd Infantry
Division (Light)
Unit
Type
Base
Barracks
Pacific Command (PACOM)
HQ
Honolulu,HI Camp Smith
U.S. Army Pacific
(USARPAC)
HQ Bat
Honolulu,HI Fort Shafter
45.SuppGr
Wahiawa/Oahu,HI
Schofield Bks
68.MedCo (AA)/524.SB
UH-60A Wahiawa/Oahu,HI
Wheeler AAF
B.Co/214.Av(M)/524.SB
CH-47D Wahiawa/Oahu,HI
Wheeler AAF
25th Infantry Division
(Light) "Tropic
Lightning"
HQ Co
Wahiawa/Oahu,HI
Schofield Bks
DivSuppCom
Wahiawa/Oahu,HI
Schofield Bks
C.Co/25.Av (AVIM) no
helicopter assigned
Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler
AAF
AvBrig
Wahiawa/Oahu,HI
Schofield Bks
1.Bat/25.Av (ATK)
OH-58D(R)
Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler
AAF
2.Bat/25.Av
(AHB)
Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler
AAF
2.Bat/25.Av/A.Co (AHC)
UH-60L Wahiawa/Oahu,HI
Wheeler AAF
2.Bat/25.Av/B.Co (AHC)
UH-60L Wahiawa/Oahu,HI
Wheeler AAF
2.Bat/25.Av/C.Co (CMD)
UH-60A,EH-60C,OH-58D
Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler
AAF
2.Bat/25.Av/D.Co
(AVUM)
Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler
AAF
3.Sq/4.Cav OH-58D(R)
Wahiawa/Oahu,HI
Schofield Bks
G.Co/58.Av
(ATS)
Wahiawa/Oahu,HI Wheeler
AAF
Back to
Top
U.S. Army Japan (USARJ)
HQ Co
Sagamihara,Japan Camp
Zama
9.TSC
Sagamihara,Japan Camp
Zama
78.AvBat
(CMD)
Sagamihara,Japan Camp
Zama/Kastner AAF
78.AvBat/A.Co C-12F,
UH-60A Sagamihara,Japan
Camp Zama/Kastner AAF
78.AvBat/D.Co
Sagamihara,Japan Camp
Zama/Kastner AAF
U.S. Army Alaska
(USARAK)
HQ
Anchorage,AK Fort
Richardson
ArcticSuppBrig
Anchorage,AK Fort
Richardson
4.Bat/123.Av
(TA)
Fairbanks,AK Fort
Wainwright/Ladd AAF
4.Bat/123.Av/B.Co (MHC)
CH-47D Fairbanks,AK Fort
Wainwright/Ladd AAF
4.Bat/123.Av/D.Co (AHC)
UH-60A Fairbanks,AK Fort
Wainwright/Ladd AAF
C.Co/123.Av (AVIM)
UH-60A, CH-47D
Fairbanks,AK Fort
Wainwright/Ladd AAF
68.MedDet (AA) UH-60A
Fairbanks,AK Fort
Wainwright/Ladd AAF
129.MedDet (AA) UH-1V
Anchorage,AK Fort
Richardson/Bryant AAF
USAG Fort Greely/AvDet
UH-1H Delta Junction,AK
Fort Greely/Allen AAF
Back to
Top
8th U.S. Army (EUSA)
HQ
Yongsan,RoK Yongsan Main
Post 1
6.CavBrig
(Air)
Pyongtaek,RoK Camp
Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
1.Sq/6.Cav (ATK) AH-64A
Hoengsong,RoK Camp Eagle
3.Sq/6.Cav (ATK) AH-64D
Pyongtaek,RoK Camp
Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
17.AvBrig
(TA)
Yongsan,RoK Yongsan Main
Post 1
1.Bat/52.Av
(CMD)
Songnam,RoK Seoul AB
1.Bat/52.Av/A.Co (CS)
UH-60A Songnam,RoK Seoul
AB
1.Bat/52.Av/B.Co (CS)
UH-60A Songnam,RoK Seoul
AB
1.Bat/52.Av/C.Co (CS)
UH-60A Songnam,RoK Seoul
AB
1.Bat/52.Av/D.Co
(AVUM)
Songnam,RoK Seoul AB
2.Bat/52.Av
(MHB)
Pyongtaek,RoK Camp
Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
2.Bat/52.Av/A.Co (M)
CH-47D Pyongtaek,RoK
Camp Humphreys/Desiderio
AAF
2.Bat/52.Av/B.Co (M)
CH-47D Pyongtaek,RoK
Camp Humphreys/Desiderio
AAF
6.Bat/52.Av/A.Co (TA)
C-12F Songnam,RoK Seoul
AB
Back to
Top
164.ATSGr
(ATS)
Yongsan,RoK Yongsan Main
Post 2
B.Co/58.Av
(ATS)
Uijongbu,RoK Camp Red
Cloud
B.Co/58.Av/1.Pl
(ATS)
Chunchon,RoK Camp Page
B.Co/58.Av/Tower
(ATS)
Pyongtaek,RoK Camp
Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
B.Co/58.Av/Tower
(ATS)
Taegu,RoK Camp Walker
B.Co/58.Av/Radar
(ATS)
Suwon,RoK Madison
RadioSite
D.Co/58.Av
(ATS)
Yongsan,RoK Yongsan Main
Post 2
D.Co/58.Av/2.Pl
(ATS)
Pyongtaek,RoK Camp
Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
D.Co/58.Av/Tower
(ATS)
Uijongbu,RoK Camp
Stanley/Cochran AAF
D.Co/58.Av/Tower
(ATS)
Tongduchon-Ni,RoK Camp
Casey
D.Co/58.Av/Tower
(ATS)
Uijongbu,RoK Camp
LaGuardia
18.MedCom
Yongsan,RoK Yongsan
South Post 1
52.MedBat
(Evac)
Yongsan,RoK Yongsan
South Post 1
377.MedCo (AA) UH-60A
Pyongtaek,RoK Camp
Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
377.MedCo/Det.1 (AA)
UH-60A Taegu,RoK Camp
Walker
542.MedCo (AA) UH-60A
Chunchon,RoK Camp Page
542.MedCo/Det.1 (AA)
UH-60A
Tongduchon-Ni,RoK Camp
Casey
19.TSC
Taegu,RoK Camp Henry
C.Co/52.Av (AVIM)
UH-60A
Pyongtaek,RoK Camp
Humphreys/Desiderio AAF
G.Co/52.Av (AVIM) UH-60A
Hoengsong,RoK Camp Eagle
Back to
Top
2nd Infantry Division
(Light) "Warriors"
HQ Co
Uijongbu,RoK Camp Red
Cloud
DivSuppCom
Tongduchon-Ni,RoK Camp
Casey
C.Co/2.Av (AVIM) no
helicopter assigned
Uijongbu,RoK Camp
Stanley/Cochran AAF
2.AvBrig
Uijongbu,RoK Camp
Stanley/Cochran AAF
1.Bat/2.Av (ATK) AH-64D
Chunchon,RoK Camp Page
2.Bat/2.Av
(AHB)
Uijongbu,RoK Camp
Stanley/Cochran AAF
2.Bat/2.Av/A.Co (AHC)
UH-60L Uijongbu,RoK Camp
Stanley/Cochran AAF
2.Bat/2.Av/B.Co (AHC)
UH-60L Uijongbu,RoK Camp
Stanley/Cochran AAF
2.Bat/2.Av/C.Co (CMD)
UH-60A,EH-60C,OH-58D
Uijongbu,RoK Camp
Stanley/Cochran AAF
2.Bat/2.Av/D.Co
(AVUM)
Uijongbu,RoK Camp
Stanley/Cochran AAF
4.Sq/7.Cav
Munsan,RoK Camp Garry
Owen
4.Sq/7.Cav/D.Trp (ACT)
OH-58D Tonggo-Ri,RoK
Camp Stanton
4.Sq/7.Cav/E.Trp (ACT)
OH-58D Tonggo-Ri,RoK
Camp Stanton
4.Sq/7.Cav/F.Trp
(AVUM)
Tonggo-Ri,RoK Camp
Stanton
Back to
Top
AA = Air Ambulance
AAF = Army Airfield
ACT = Air Cavalry Troop
AE = Aerial Exploitation
AHC = Assault helicopter
company
ATK = Attack
ATS = Air traffic
service
AvSuppBat =
Aviation support
battalion
AVUM = Aviation
unit maintenance
AVIM = Aviation
intermediate maintenance
Bks = Barracks
CAC = Command and
control
CMD = Command
Evac = Evacuation
GSAB = General support
aviation battalion
M = Medium helicopter
MI = Military
intelligence
RC = Reserve component
SAC = Support aviation
company
United States Army
Pacific Command
(USARPAC).
The U. S. Army, Pacific
serves as the Army
Component Command to the
Commander in Chief U. S.
Pacific Command
(USCINCPAC), less the
geographic area of
Korea. USARPAC commands
active U. S. Army and U.
S. Army Reserve forces
in Alaska, Hawaii,
Japan, and in
possessions and trust
territories administered
by the United States in
US Pacific command.
In October 2000, USARPAC
became a Multi-Component
Unit (MCU) and Army
Service Component
Command (ASCC) as part
of the US Army
transformation to meet
the emerging security
needs of the United
States in which USARPAC
continues to be a key
strategic player. The
whole idea of the
multi-component unit is
to give active army
units additional
resources to accomplish
the mission. The
multi-component
integration is important
in the overall picture
of the Army's success
going into the 21st
century. With the
Reserve and National
Guard assuming a more
active role in total
Army operations and the
"One Team, One Fight,
One Future" concept,
multi-component
integration provides for
a better understanding
of each component's role
in achieving victory.
USARPAC trains Army
Forces for support of
military operations and
peacetime engagements in
order to contribute to
decisive victory and
promote regional
stability. USARPAC
solicits, awards, and
administers contracts in
support of
mission-related
requirements, including
administrative supplies
and services, waste
disposal, food services,
minor construction,
facilities, maintenance
and repair, grounds
maintenance, ADP
equipment and services,
and laundry services.
Following World War II,
numerous Army
headquarters in the
central Pacific were
consolidated with the
goal of forming a single
Army command based in
Hawaii. In 1957, the
U.S. Army, Pacific
(USARPAC) was
established at Fort
Shafter, following
inactivation of the Far
East Command. As Army
component of the unified
command led by the U.S.
Commander in Chief
Pacific, USARPAC was
assigned a threefold
mission: Provide
necessary ground Army
combat forces; Support
those forces
administratively and
logistically; and
Provide reserves and
contingency plans to
meet any ground threat
to United States
interests in the
Pacific.
On March 23, 1979, The
Department of the Army
announced the
establishment of the
U.S. Army Western
Command (WESTCOM). Then,
a decade later, U.S.
Army forces in the
Pacific were further
consolidated. Army units
in Alaska and in Japan
were placed under the
command of the Fort
Shafter headquarters,
which was once again
designated U.S. Army,
Pacific. The new command
was formally
reestablished on August
30, 1990.
In the years since the
end of the Vietnam War,
Army forces in the
Pacific have
participated in major
peacekeeping operations
in the Sinai Desert, and
have provided
humanitarian and
disaster relief missions
in Bangladesh, the
Philippines, Guam, and
the island of Kauai.
Although fully trained
for warfare, USARPAC
soldiers are also
skilled in conducting
operations other than
war. Whether it is
assuring order among
refugees at Guantanamo,
providing flood relief
in the deltas of South
Asia, or maintaining a
cease fire in the Middle
East, USARPAC personnel
operate far and wide in
peacekeeping and
humanitarian missions.
In late 1994, fully one
half of the 25th
Infantry Division
deployed to Haiti as the
United States and other
governments worked to
restore democracy to
that unfortunate nation.
Two years later, USARPAC
peacekeepers went to
Bosnia to help restore
hope to that
warshattered land.
Joint Rear Area
Coordination (JRAC)
The United States Army
Pacific (USARPAC), in
partnership with local,
state and federal
authorities, have
developed a plan of
preparedness for the
state of Hawaii. The
Commander-in-Chief,
Pacific Command, has
identified the USARPAC
as the executive agent
for joint rear area
coordination (JRAC).
This task is normally
accomplished in a
wartime theater of
operation, but in this
case, it is being
accomplished for the
state of Hawaii. Teaming
with local and state
civil organizations and
federal agencies,
JRAC-Hawaii (HI) has
accomplished a
significant amount in
the short time since
Sept. 11.
JRAC-HI is protecting
its military
installations by
reducing and restricting
entry points using
roving patrols. Guard
duties have completely
changed. Guards must now
understand the changing
dynamics of a more
dangerous world, and
must learn to expect the
unexpected. Military
installations worldwide
are now on the front
lines and are the
subject of surveillance
and probes more than
ever before. Guards must
be more alert to
activities both on and
off the installations,
and they must constantly
vary security procedure
patterns to eliminate
predictability. They
must also be linked to
local law enforcement
and must be the
beneficiaries � and
target audience � of a
regular joint and
interagency intelligence
summary. Because of
these changing
conditions, JRAC-HI
reinstituted more
formalized guard mounts
and instructions �
tailored to the current
operational environment.
JRAC-HI has identified
mission essential or
vulnerable areas (MEVAs)
both on and off the
installations. MEVAs are
facilities and
capabilities essential
to accomplishing the
military mission. These
MEVAs have been
thoroughly assessed and
security needs
addressed. Tailored
after general defense
plan (GDP) battle books
from the Cold War in
Europe, MEVA folders
detail every aspect
relevant to the defense
of these critical sites.
Local civil authorities
have done the same with
over 150 of their own
MEVAs and both the civil
and military authorities
regularly conduct site
surveys.
JRAC-HI has
fine-tuned
procedures for providing
military support to
civil authorities (MSCA)
in the event of a
natural or man-made
disaster. As the
executive agent for MSCA
in Hawaii, American
Samoa, and neighboring
islands, JRAC-HI
provides a
defense-coordinating
officer to coordinate
military support of
civilian consequence
management operations.
Even before Sept. 11,
JRAC-HI maintained a
close relationship with
local and state
government leaders, who
can leverage many
standing MSCA concepts
and plans as the JRAC
operation comes
together. JRAC-HI's
participation in
steering committees and
plenary groups, such as
the Hawaii Emergency
Preparedness Executive
Committee, the Hawaii
Energy Council and the
Joint Armed
Services/State of Hawaii
Civil Defense
Coordinating Committee,
is instrumental in
sharing information and
developing joint and
civil-military solutions
to emerging challenges.
JRAC-HI has established
quick reaction forces
(QRFs) drawn from both
U.S. Marine Corps and
Army units. These QRFs
are capable of moving on
short notice by air or
road to any place in the
state to provide
additional security or
to assist in any other
way. While awaiting
adjudication at the
national level on the
procedures for employing
those forces in domestic
situations, JRAC-HI is
regularly conducting
joint training with
civil authorities.
JRAC-HI has worked to
identify seams in its
collective efforts to
secure Hawaii's soil and
people. This
coordination is taking
place with all the
military services in
Hawaii, state and local
civil defense (CD), U.S.
Coast Guard (USCG),
National Guard (NG),
Honolulu Police
Department (HPD), fire
departments, and a host
of other local and
federal government
agencies such as the
state health and
transportation
departments. Also
included in this effort
are the FBI, Immigration
and Naturalization
Service (INS), U.S.
Customs Service (USCS)
and the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), as
well as selected private
firms and enterprises
involved in supporting
Hawaii's critical
infrastructure. The
Joint Interagency
Planning Group,
established by USARPAC
within days of the
attacks, has been the
principal driver behind
this effort.
"If ever time should
come, When vain and
aspiring men shall
possess the highest
seats in government, Our
Country will stand in
need of it's experienced
Patriots to prevent it's
ruin" ...Samuel
Adams
|
|
|
|
|
Compare
Political Parties,
Political Party
Comparison. American
Patriot Party National,
Republican Party
National, Democratic
Party National,
Libertarian Party
National, National
Parties.
|
|
|
|
|
|